Biomechanical behavior of different implant abutment materials | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 10, Volume 67, Issue 4, October 2021, Page 3381-3391 PDF (709.36 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.80631.1676 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Mohamed Atif Elkholy  1; mohamed sedeek2; waleed elshahawy3; elrefaiy qenawy4
| ||||
| 1Fixed Prosthodontics, faculty of dentistry at tanta university | ||||
| 2Associate Professor, Fixed prosthodontics Depart. Faculty of Dentistry. Tanta Universty (Main Supervisor) | ||||
| 3Assistant Professor, Fixed Prosthodontics Department Faculty of Dentistry Tanta University | ||||
| 4Professor, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science. Tanta University | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Purpose: to study the mechanical properties and Finite Element Stress Analysis of three implant abutment materials. Materials and Methods : Fifteen bars (25mm length, 4mm. thick and 5mm.width)of three abutment materials ;High Performance Polymer Hybrid abutments , Nano-Fiber Reinforced Composite and Fiber Reinforced Composite divided into three groups were exposed to Flexure Strength and Deflection tests. Fifteen implant abutments (two parts abutment) covered by all ceramic crowns divided into three groups were exposed to Static Fracture Resistance test and Finite Element Stress Analysis .Results: Flexure Strength tests mean and standard deviation of bar specimens showed significant difference, where Gp I, II, III were 519.29±0.46), 200.74±0.33and 315.43±0.59) .Also, Deflection test mean and standard deviation were 3.052±0.040, 0.984±0.106, 2.028±0.027 receptively revealed significant difference. The comparison between fracture resistance mean and standard deviation of the tested abutment three groupswere 642.00±.5.637,306.00±30.496 and 514.40±12.915 respectivelyand revealed significant difference. Finite Element Stress Analysis of applied vertical load on the three abutment materials did not have clear difference but the least stresses created on bone with Nano-FRC abutment(16.2) followed with FRC (17.32) then BioHPP abutment (18.55).Conclusion: Fracture strength of BioHPP abutments with ceramic crowns had the potential to withstand maximum occlusal forces, also showed better fracture patterns than the FRC and NFRC abutments. and showed a better stress distribution on the set, suggesting a good mechanical behavior. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| : Implant abutment; Bio HPP; Nanofiber; Fiber reinforced Composite Finite Element StressAnalysis | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 260 PDF Download: 268 |
||||
