EFFECT OF FERTILIZATION WITH SURGE FLOW TECHNIQUE ON APPLICATION EFFICIENCY, WATER PRODUCTIVITY, YIELD AND IRRIGATION COST OF MAIZE CROP (ZEA MAYS L.) | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 5, Volume 39, Issue 1, January 2022, Page 71-92 PDF (1.2 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2021.104549.1051 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Abdelaziz M. Okasha   1; Elsaid M. Khalifa2; Moustafa M. Moustafa3; Mohamed S. Khattab4
| ||||
| 1Assoc. Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Kafrelsheikh U., Kafrelsheikh, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Prof., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Kafrelsheikh U., Kafrelsheikh, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Chief Researcher, Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| 4Assist. Researcher, Ag. Eng. Res. Inst., Ag. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The development of equipment and management guidelines for surge flow irrigation has made it possible to save more irrigation water and enhance efficiency of fertilizers application. In the context, the experiment was carried out at Gharbia Province, Egypt during the growing season of 2017/2018. The overall aim was to improve management of fertigation through surge flow technique to reduce advance time, maximize fertigation application efficiency, water productivity and minimize cost of irrigation in comparison to continuous furrow irrigation under clay loam textured soil conditions for maize crop production in the Delta of Egypt. Treatments were three discharge rates of irrigation water mainly 0.56, 0.75 and 0.95L/s, with 4, 5 and 6 pulses and chemical injected surges of 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th in a 140 meters long furrows. The Results showed that surge flow irrigation technique with 6 surges reduced advance time by 8.7, 8.8 and 5.5% of continuous flow under different discharge rates of 0.56, 0.75 and 0.95L/s, respectively. The greatest value of chemicals application efficiency of 91% was obtained under discharge rate of 0.56L/s with 6 surges during the 4th fertilized injected surge. The highest water productivity value of 1.83kg/m3 was obtained by the treatment of 6 pulses with 0.95L/s flow rate at fertilization in the fourth pulse compared with all other treatments. The highest irrigation cost of 924.5L.E/fed/season was recorded under discharge of 0.56L/s with continuous flow irrigation compared with the lowest of 679.7L.E/fed/season which was noticed with 6 pulses treatment at discharge of 0.95L/s. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Surge flow; Chemicals application efficiency; Water productivity; Irrigation cost; Maize crop (Zea Mays L.) | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Allen, R. G.; L. S. Pereira; D. Raes and M. Smith (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome, 300(9), D05109.
Amer, M. H., Abd El Hafez, S. A., and Abd El Ghany, M. B. (2017). Water Saving in Irrigated Agriculture in Egypt. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: Saarbrücken, Germany.pp,7 and 11.
Amer, M., and Attafy, T. (2017). Effect of surge flow on some irrigation indices of furrow irrigation system. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, Mansoura University, 8(12), 703-708.
Boldt, A. L., Watts, D. G., Eisenhauer, D. E., and Schepers, J. S. (1994). Simulation of water applied nitrogen distribution under surge irrigation. Transactions of the ASAE, 37(4), 1157-1165.
Doorenbos, J. and W. O. Pruitt (1977). Crop Water Requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 24. Land and Water Development Division, FAO, Rome, 144.
Ebrahimian, H., Keshavarz, M. R., and Playán Jubillar, E. (2014). Surface fertigation: a review, gaps and needs. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2014 12(3): 820-837
Eid, S. M. (1998). Surge flow irrigation for corn and wheat under different land levelling practices in heavy clay soils. Ph. D. Thesis, Soil Sci. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Tanta University.
Eldeiry, A. A., Garcia, L. A., El-Zaher, A. S. A., and Kiwan, M. E. S. (2005). Furrow irrigation system design for clay soils in arid regions. Applied engineering in agriculture, 21(3), 411-420.
FAO (2015). World Fertilizer Trends and Outlooks to 2018. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Google Scholar].
Gascho, G. J. and A. M. Mashali (1991). Soil-Water nutrient interaction under fertigation system. FAO, Consultation on fertigation/Chemigation, 8 - 11 Sept., Cairo, Egypt: 83-98.
Hoffman, G. J.; T. A. Howell and K. H. Solomon (1992). Management of farm irrigation systems. ASAE Monograph No. 9 Ed. Hoffman, et al. ASAE, USA. pp: 1040.
Horst, M. G.; S. S. Shamutalov; J. M. Goncalves and L. S. Pereira (2007). Assessing Impacts of Surge flow Irrigation on Water Saving and Productivity of Cotton. Agricultural Water Management, vol. 87: 115-127.
Hou, Z.; P. L; B. Li; J. Gong and Y. Wang (2007). Effects of fertigation scheme on N uptake and N use efficiency in cotton. Plant Soil290:115-126.
Humpherys, A. S. (1989). Surge irrigation: II An overview. ICID Bulletin 38(2): 35-48.
Ismail, S. M. (2004). Effectiveness of surge flow irrigation in Egypt. Ph. D. thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Ismail, S. M. (2006). Effect of tillage on water advance and distribution under surge and continuous furrow irrigation for cotton in Egypt. Irrigation and Drainage Journal, 55(2): 191-199.
James, L. G. (1988). Principle of Farm Irrigation System Design. John Willey and sons. New York.
Kanber R.; H. Koksal; S. Onder; S. Kapur and S. Sahan (2001). Comparison of surge and continuous furrowmethods for cotton in the Harran plain. Agricultural Water Management, Vol. 47: 119-135.
Keller, J. and D. Karameli (1974). Trickle irrigation design parameters. ASAE 17(4): 512-684.
Khalifa, E., A. Okasha, S. Shawat (2019). Development of surface irrigation using surge irrigation technique. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28(4), 3121-3130.
Khalifa, E., M. Mahmoud, and M. Khatab (2019). Effect of different chemicals injected surges on chemicals application and distribution uniformity through furrow irrigation in clay soil under delta region of Egypt. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28(9), 6444-6452
Kifle, M.; K. Tilahun and E. Yazew (2008). Evaluation of surge flow furrow irrigation for onion production in a semiarid region of Ethiopia. Irrigation science, 26(4), 325-333.
Mohammadi, A., Besharat, S., and Abbasi, F. (2019). Effects of irrigation and fertilization management on reducing nitrogen losses and increasing corn yield under furrow irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 213, 1116-1129.
Moustafa, M.M. (2013). Surge flow chemigation. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research (Special Issue / 3rd International Conference on Agricultural and Biological Engineering) November 2013. "Engineering Applications for Sustainable Agricultural Development", vol. 91, No. 2 (a), pp. 255-272.
Ojaghlou, H., Sohrabi, T., Abbasi, F., and Javani, H. (2020). Development and evaluation of a water flow and solute transport model for furrow fertigation with surge flow. Irrigation and Drainage, 69(4), 682-695.
Perea, H.; E. Bautista, D. J. Hunsaker; T. S. Strelkoff, C. Williams, and F. J. Adamsen (2011). Nonuniform and Unsteady Solute Transport in Furrow Irrigation. II. Description of Filed Experiments and Calibration of Infiltration and Roughness Coefficients. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 137(5): 315–326.
Rao, B. K., Bhatnagar, P. R., Kamble, T., Kurothe, R. S., Mishra, P. K., Sharma, R., Kumar A. and Pande, V. C. (2019). Surge-flow alternate furrow irrigation for enhancing water productivity in semiarid regions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 89(12), 1999-2002.
Rasoulzadeh, A. and A. R. Sepaskhah (2003). Scaled Infiltration Equations for Furrow Irrigation, Biosystems Engineering. DOI: 10.1016/j. Biosystems Eng. 2003.07.004.86(3): 375-383.
Sabillon, G. N.; G. P. Merkley; (2004). Fertigation guidelines for furrow irrigation. Span J. Agr. Res. 2(4):576-587.
Sharaby, N. N. (2015). Studying engineering technique for irrigation systems development. M. Sc. Thesis, Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag., Kafrelsheikh Univ., Egypt.
Shock, C. C. and T. Welch (2011). Surge Irrigation, Sustainable Agriculture Techniques, Oregon State University, Department of Crop and Soil Science Ext/CrS 135.
Sial, J. K., Khan, M. A., and Ahmad, N. (2006). Performance of surge irrigation under borders. Pak. J. Agri. Sci, 43(3-4), 186-192.
Siyal A. A.; K. L. Bristow; and J. Simunek (2012) Minimizing nitrogen leaching from furrow irrigation through novel fertilizer placement and soil management strategies. Agricultural Water Management 115:242–251
Smith, R. J.; S. R. Raine and J. Minkovich (2005). Irrigation application efficiency and deep drainage potential under surface irrigated cotton. Agricultural Water Management, 71(2): 117-130.
Soroush, F.; F. B. Mostafazadeh; S. F. Mousavi and F. Abbasi (2012). Solute distribution uniformity and fertilizer losses under mean drainage and standard furrow irrigation methods. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 6(5):884-890.
Spencer, G. D., Krutz, L. J., Falconer, L. L., Henry, W. B., Henry, C. G., Larson, E. J., Pringle, H.C., Bryant, C.J. and Atwill, R. L. (2019). Irrigation Water Management Technologies for Furrow‐Irrigated Corn that Decrease Water Use and Improve Yield and On‐Farm Profitability. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management, 5(1), 1-8.https://doi.org/10.2134/cftm2018.12.0100.
USDl (1993). Report of the United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation Cooperative Agreement for Surge flow irrigation Research and Development Program, Grand Valley Unit. Colorado State University, Colorado, USA.
Valipour, M. (2013). Increasing irrigation efficiency by management strategies: Cutback and surge irrigation. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 8 (1): 35-43.
Worth, B. and J. Xin (1983). Farm mechanization for profit, Granada publishing. UK. P. 269. Google Scholar.
Zamora-Re, M. I., Dukes, M. D., Hensley, D., Rowland, D., and Graham, W. (2020). The effect of irrigation strategies and nitrogen fertilizer rates on maize growth and grain yield. Irrigation Science, 38(4), 461-478. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 294 PDF Download: 237 |
||||
