نموذج مقترح للمفاضلة بين طرق تخصص التکاليف غير المباشرة

نجدي محمد علي رفاعي, سامي; عباس رشک, احمد

doi:10.21608/alat.2016.218342

	نموذج مقترح للمفاضلة بين طرق تخصص التکاليف غير المباشرة "دراسة تطبيقية"
المجلة المصرية للدراسات التجارية
Article 37, Volume 40, Issue 4, October 2016, Page 1413-1440 PDF (806.58 K)
Document Type: المقالة الأصلية
DOI: 10.21608/alat.2016.218342
View on SCiNiTO
Authors
سامي نجدي محمد علي رفاعي; احمد عباس رشک
کلية التجارة - جامعة المنصورة
Abstract
The problem of allocating indirect costs is considered the most important problem that was and still in the focus of many researches. According to the disagreement with the results of methods applied in the allocation of those costs, 2 especially as the objectivity and fairness in the allocation of those costs greatly affect the cost accuracy but also on the accuracy of the cost data system in general. The allocation of indirect costs represents the decisive step to get accurate costs for products or services. It also represents the main goal of the study to provide a model for a trade-off between the methods of indirect cost allocation by determining the degree of complexity of methods of indirect cost allocation, and the factors that influenced and associated with the external and internal environment of the institution. The study has found that there is no typical model system can be applied equally in all institutions and circumstances. However, some of the attributes of a suitable system will depend on the specific circumstances of the institution. The extent of effectiveness of the system depends on its ability to adapt to changes in the external and internal conditions. The study also concluded that it must rely on an integrated basis for judging the objective methods of indirect costs allocated to help to increase the value of the information provided to beneficiaries


References
A – Periodicals: 1- Al- Omiri, M. & Drury, C., "A survey of factors influencing the choice of product costing systems in UK organizations", Management Accounting Research, Vol 18, 2007. 2- Colin Drury, Mike Tayles ,"Explicating the design of overhead absorption procedures in UK organizations", The British Accounting Review, Vol. 37, 2005. 3- Gurowka, J. & Lawson, Raef A., "Selecting the Right Costing Tool for Your Business Needs", The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 2007. 4- Sandra Tillema,. "Towards an integrated contingency framework for MAS sophistication Case studies on the scope of accounting instruments in Dutch power and gas companies", Management Accounting Research, 16, 2005. 5- Susan B. Hughes, S. B. and Katha. Paulson Gjerde., "Do Different Cost Systems Make a Difference", Management Accounting Quarterly, 2003. 6- Tariq H. Ismail, Nancy Mohamed Mahmoud ,"The Influence of Organizational and Environmental Factors on Cost Systems Design in Egypt", British Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, March, 2012. 7- Toomas Haldma, Kertu Lääts "Influencing Contingencies On Management Accounting Practices In Estonian Manufacturing Companies", University of Tartu Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, 2002. B – Thesis & dissertations: 1- Martin Hansson, "The Cost, The Model and The Logistic A Cost Measurement system at Volvo Logistic Corporation", Master Thesis, School of Economics and Commercial Law,2003.
Statistics Article View: 45 PDF Download: 71

نموذج مقترح للمفاضلة بين طرق تخصص التکاليف غير المباشرة "دراسة تطبيقية"