Evaluation of Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Implant Abutments with Hybrid and Internal Hex Connections Using Different Materials | ||||
Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
Article 17, Volume 68, Issue 1 - Serial Number 4, January 2022, Page 749-761 PDF (1.89 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.100254.1824 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Khaled Elbanna 1; Alaa Alqutub 2; Shereen Kotb Salem 3 | ||||
1Fixed Prosthodontics Division, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University, KSA. | ||||
2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Umm Al-Qura University, KSA. | ||||
3Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the internal fit of hybrid and internal hex connections using different materials. Materials&Methods: Forty abutments were divided into 2 groups according to connection type. Each group was subdivided into 4 subgroups according to material (Zr, Ti, Co-Cr and soft-milled Co-Cr-Mo). Internal fit was measured using replica technique. Results: All the samples had clinically acceptable gap values ≤150 µm where internal hex connection had narrower gap than conical connection. Zirconia was the material with lowest gap values, followed by titanium and soft-milled Co-Cr-Mo. Co-Cr had the largest gap distance. Conclusions: 1: Internal hex connection has better internal fit than hybrid connection with more consistent results among different materials. 2: Zirconia showed the best overall internal adaptation with consistent performance among the two connections used. 3: Low marginal gap distance of CAD/CAM conical abutments may not necessarily indicate proper seating of the abutments. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Hybrid connections; Internal connections; CAD/CAM abutments; soft-milled Co-Cr-Mo; Zirconia | ||||
Statistics Article View: 216 PDF Download: 252 |
||||