The Role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Improving the Outcome of Reduction Mammoplasty, An Egyptian Experience
Kadry, H., Ashraf, M., Nan, M., Elsharkawy, O. (2022). The Role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Improving the Outcome of Reduction Mammoplasty, An Egyptian Experience. EKB Journal Management System, 46(1), 97-106. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2022.220458
Hamed Kadry; Mohamed Ashraf; Mina Nan; Omar A. Elsharkawy. "The Role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Improving the Outcome of Reduction Mammoplasty, An Egyptian Experience". EKB Journal Management System, 46, 1, 2022, 97-106. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2022.220458
Kadry, H., Ashraf, M., Nan, M., Elsharkawy, O. (2022). 'The Role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Improving the Outcome of Reduction Mammoplasty, An Egyptian Experience', EKB Journal Management System, 46(1), pp. 97-106. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2022.220458
Kadry, H., Ashraf, M., Nan, M., Elsharkawy, O. The Role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Improving the Outcome of Reduction Mammoplasty, An Egyptian Experience. EKB Journal Management System, 2022; 46(1): 97-106. doi: 10.21608/ejprs.2022.220458

The Role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Improving the Outcome of Reduction Mammoplasty, An Egyptian Experience

The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Article 15, Volume 46, Issue 1, January 2022, Page 97-106  XML PDF (10.64 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejprs.2022.220458
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Hamed Kadry email 1; Mohamed Ashraf1; Mina Nan2; Omar A. Elsharkawy1
1The Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University
2Um Masreen General Hospital
Abstract
Introduction: “T” junction dehiscence puts a burden on the reputation of breast reduction. A lot of methods have been described to solve this issue but still have their limitations. iNPWT is being popularized in different specialties as a preventive solution to problematic incisions (e.g. knee and hip replacements). It helps prevention of wound complications through reduction of edema decreasing tension on wound edges and increasing vascularity. iNPWT has always been advocated not only to help wound healing but it is also suggested it produces a better scar on the long term. Patients and Methods: Twenty patients presenting seeking breast reduction were included in this study. The Bilateral nature of the breast allowed for the patient to be her own control with randomization of treatment modalities per side. iNPWT was used on one side while on the other side conventional dressing was used. The rate of wound healing complication as well as quality of the scar (using the Manchester score), were the main pillars of this study. Results: This study showed that the incidence of dehiscence in iNPWT group was 35%, while it was 45% in the standard dressing. Though we felt there are numerical and clinical superiority in the incidence and even the depth of dehiscence between iNPWT & traditional dressing, there was no statically significance to support this observation. The Manchester scar score showed a significant higher number in the standard care group with a p-value of (p=0.0114). Conclusion: iNPWT offers an alternative preventative measure for “T” junction problems in Wise pattern reduction mammoplasty. Though it was not statistically significant we still believe that it showed superior results. iNPWT showed improvement in the quality of the scar. Further national studies about its cost effectiveness in developing countries are recommended as well as its uses in other fields of plastic surgery
Keywords
NPWT; Dehiscence; Scar; Reduction
References
1- Purohit S.: Reduction mammoplasty. Indian J. Plast. Surg., Oct. 41 (Suppl): S64-79. PMID: 20174545; PMCID: PMC2825129, 2008. 2- Renó W.T.: Reduction mammaplasty with a circular folded pedicle technique. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., Jul. 90 (1): 65- 74; discussion 75-6. PMID: 1615094, 1992.

3- Saleem L. and John J.R.: Unfavourable results following reduction mammoplasty. Indian J. Plast. Surg., May 46 (2): 401-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.118620. PMID: 24501476; PMCID: PMC3901921, 2013. 4- Khalil H.H., Malahias M. and Shetty G.: Triangular lipodermal flaps in Wise pattern reduction mammoplasty (superomedial pedicle): A novel technique to reduce Tjunction necrosis. Plast. Surg. (Oakv). Fall, 24 (3): 191- 194. doi: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000975. Epub 2016 Aug 19. PMID: 28439509; PMCID: PMC5395051, 2016. 5- Fischer J.P., Cleveland E.C., Shang E.K., Nelson J.A. and Serletti J.M.: Complications following reduction mammaplasty: a review of 3538 cases from the 2005-2010 NSQIP data sets. Aesthet. Surg. J., Jan. 1; 34 (1): 66-73. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13515676. Epub 2013 Dec 13. PMID: 24334499, 2014. 6- Chao J.W., Taylor E.M. and Rohde C.H.: Reducing wound healing complications of Wise pattern breast reduction with the inverted "V" modification. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg., Mar. 67 (3): 421-2. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps. 2013.09.032. Epub 2013 Oct 3. PMID: 24120419, 2014. 7- De la Plaza R., de la Cruz L., Moreno C. and Soto L.: The crossed dermal flaps technique for breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg., Nov-Dec. 28 (6): 383-92. doi: 10.1007/s00266-004-0370-4. Epub 2005 Jan 6. PMID: 15633020, 2004. 8- Strugala V. and Martin R.: Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials Evaluating a Prophylactic Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System for the Prevention of Surgical Site Complications. Surg. Infect (Larchmt), Oct. 18 (7): 810-819. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.156. Epub 2017 Sep 8. PMID: 28885895; PMCID: PMC5649123, 2017. 9- Wilkes R.P., Kilpad D.V., Zhao Y., Kazala R. and McNulty A.: Closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy (CIM): biomechanics. Surg. Innov., Mar. 19 (1): 67-75. doi: 10.1177/1553350611414920. Epub 2011 Aug 25. PMID: 21868417, 2012. 10- Karlakki S.L., Hamad A.K., Whittall C., Graham N.M., Banerjee R.D. and Kuiper J.H.: Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: A randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res., Aug. 5 (8): 328-37. doi: 10.1302/2046- 3758.58.BJR-2016-0022.R1. PMID: 27496913; PMCID: PMC5013893, 2016. 11- Pellino G., Sciaudone G., Candilio G., De Fatico G.S., Landino I., Della Corte A., Guerniero R., Benevento R., Santoriello A., Campitiello F., Selvaggi F. and Canonico S.: Preventive NPWT over closed incisions in general surgery: Does age matter? Int. J. Surg., 12 (Suppl 2): S64- S68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.378. Epub 2014 Aug 23. PMID: 25159226, 2014. 12- Niimi Y., Mori S. and Takeuchi M.: A New Procedure for Wrapped-Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Congestion After Arterialized Venous Flap Surgery. Clin. Med. Insights Case Rep., Dec. 13 (10): 1179547617747279. doi: 10.1177/1179547617747279. PMID: 29270041; PMCID: PMC5731612, 2017. 13- Ray E., Mitchell S.L. and Cordeiro P.G.: Miniature Negative Pressure Dressings on Forearm Donor Sites after Radial Forearm Flap Harvest. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob Open, Jun. 15; 6 (6): e1838. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000 000001838. PMID: 30276061; PMCID: PMC6157936, 2018. 14- Galiano R.D., Hudson D., Shin J., van der Hulst R., Tanaydin V., Djohan R., Duteille F., Cockwill J., Megginson S. and Huddleston E.: Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Prevention of Wound Healing Complications Following Reduction Mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, Jan. 12; 6 (1): e1560, 2018. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001560. Erratum in: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, Mar. 23; 6 (2): e1720. PMID: 29464150; PMCID: PMC5811280, 2018. 15- Tanaydin V., Beugels J., Andriessen A., Sawor J.H. and van der Hulst R.R.W.J.: Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Disposable Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Standard Care in Bilateral Breast Reduction Mammoplasty Evaluating Surgical Site Complications and Scar Quality. Aesthetic Plast. Surg., Aug. 42 (4): 927- 935, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1095-0. Epub 2018 Feb. 13. Erratum in: Aesthetic Plast Surg. Apr. 2. PMID: 29442143; PMCID: PMC6097780, 2018. 16- Holt R. and Murphy J.: PICO™ incision closure in oncoplastic breast surgery: A case series. Br. J. Hosp. Med. (Lond), Apr. 76 (4): 217-23. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2015. 76.4.217. PMID: 25853353, 2015. 17- Beausang E., Floyd H., Dunn K.W., Orton C.I. and Ferguson M.W.: A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., Nov. 102 (6): 1954- 61. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199811000-00022. PMID: 9810991, 1998. 18- Karcioglu O., Topacoglu H., Dikme O. and Dikme O.: A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? Am. J. Emerg. Med., Apr. 36(4):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6. PMID: 29321111, 2018. 19- Manahan M.A., Buretta K.J., Chang D., Mithani S.K., Mallalieu J. and Shermak M.A.: An outcomes analysis of 2142 breast reduction procedures. Ann. Plast. Surg., Mar. 74 (3): 289-92. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31829d 2261. PMID: 256668497, 2015. 668497, 2015.                               24. O'Leary D.P., Peirce C., Anglim B., Burton M., Concannon E., Carter M., Hickey K. and Coffey J.C.: Prophylactic Negative Pressure Dressing Use in Closed Laparotomy Wounds Following Abdominal Operations: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Trial: The P.I.C.O. Trial. Ann. Surg., Jun. 265 (6): 1082-1086. doi: 10.1097/SLA. 0000000000002098. PMID: 27926575, 2017. 25- Condé-Green A., Chung T.L., Holton L.H. 3rd, Hui-Chou H.G., Zhu Y., Wang H., Zahiri H. and Singh D.P.: Incisional negative-pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following abdominal wall reconstruction: A comparative study. Ann. Plast. Surg., Oct. 71 (4): 394-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824c9073. PMID: 22868327, 2013. 

 

Statistics
Article View: 255
PDF Download: 330