Classification of Users' Opinions and Posts on Facebook Using Machine Learning Approaches | ||||
Menoufia Journal of Electronic Engineering Research | ||||
Article 5, Volume 31, Issue 2, July 2022, Page 42-54 PDF (862.47 K) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/mjeer.2022.79630.1037 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Ibrahim rouby sayed 1; Mohamed Nour2; Mohammed M Badawy 3; Ehsan Abed4 | ||||
148 Amin-Elgendy Ain Shams | ||||
2Department of Informatique research, electronic research institute, cairo | ||||
3Computer Science and Engineering Dept., Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University | ||||
4Informatique Research Dept, Electronic Research Institute, cairo | ||||
Abstract | ||||
In this research work, four classifiers are adopted, analyzed, and discussed. The classifiers are Naïve Bayes (NB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), and Logistic Regression (LR). The classifiers are operated on a dataset with more than eight-thousands of instances. The dataset contains the users' reviews and their opinions about the quality of service of restaurants. The reviews are collected from the Arabic Facebook posts. Several experiments are done to evaluate the performance of the adopted classifiers. Moreover, some features selection methods are also applied to improve the classification process. The feature selected methods are based on term-weights with N-grams, correlation, chi-square, and mutual information. Some criteria are considered to evaluate the performance of the classification process mainly: precision, recall, F-measure, and learning time. From the experimental results, the SVM classifier outperforms the other adopted ones. Also, the feature selection method based on the correlation between the individual features and the target class outperforms the other chosen methods. The same concluding remarks are expected to take place for other datasets containing comments or reviews from social media. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
Supervised Machine Learning; Classification Approaches; Feature Selection Methods; Facebook Reviews; and Performance Evaluation | ||||
Statistics Article View: 145 PDF Download: 111 |
||||