EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF TWO LAMINATE VENEERS CERAMIC MATERIALS AT TWO LOADING ANGULATIONS (IN-VITRO STUDY)
Mohamed, E., Elbasty, R., elshehawi, D. (2022). EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF TWO LAMINATE VENEERS CERAMIC MATERIALS AT TWO LOADING ANGULATIONS (IN-VITRO STUDY). EKB Journal Management System, 68(3), 2755-2764. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.145221.2154
Eman Mohamed; Reham Elbasty; dina elshehawi. "EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF TWO LAMINATE VENEERS CERAMIC MATERIALS AT TWO LOADING ANGULATIONS (IN-VITRO STUDY)". EKB Journal Management System, 68, 3, 2022, 2755-2764. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.145221.2154
Mohamed, E., Elbasty, R., elshehawi, D. (2022). 'EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF TWO LAMINATE VENEERS CERAMIC MATERIALS AT TWO LOADING ANGULATIONS (IN-VITRO STUDY)', EKB Journal Management System, 68(3), pp. 2755-2764. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.145221.2154
Mohamed, E., Elbasty, R., elshehawi, D. EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF TWO LAMINATE VENEERS CERAMIC MATERIALS AT TWO LOADING ANGULATIONS (IN-VITRO STUDY). EKB Journal Management System, 2022; 68(3): 2755-2764. doi: 10.21608/edj.2022.145221.2154

EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF TWO LAMINATE VENEERS CERAMIC MATERIALS AT TWO LOADING ANGULATIONS (IN-VITRO STUDY)

Egyptian Dental Journal
Article 29, Volume 68, Issue 3 - Serial Number 4, July 2022, Page 2755-2764  XML PDF (925.12 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2022.145221.2154
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Eman Mohamed email orcid 1; Reham Elbastyorcid 2; dina elshehawiorcid 3
1Assistant Professor, Fixed Prothodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University,
2Associate Professor, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
3Professor, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Abstract
Aim of The Study;to evaluate the Fracture Resistance of laminate veneers constructed with two different ceramic materials (Zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic (CeltaDUO) and Lithium disilicate glass ceramics (e.max CAD) at different load angulations (60o,125o).
Methodology:A total of 16 freshly extracted central incisors were mounted in epoxy blocks then prepared with butt joint design,then divided into 2 equal groups and subgroups Group1 e.max group (laminate veneers constructed from e.max CAD)/Group2 Celta duo group (laminate veneers constructed from Celtaduo) then each group was subdivided into 2 sub-groups according to loading angle.Group A load angle 60/Group B load angle 125o Fabricated by CEREC MC XL milling machine.The veneers were fired for a short firing cycles,then cemented with Choice 2 resin cement after surface treatment of both teeth and veneers according to manufacturer instructions.All samples were subjected to thermocycling equivalent to 1 year of clinical service.Measurements were reported after thermocycling.All samples were subjected to universal testing machine to evaluate the effect of Different load angulations (60o,125o) on fracture resistance.
Results;The highest fracture resistance mean value was recorded for e.max group with 60o loading angle followed by e.max group with 125o loading angle then CeltraDuo group with 60o loading angle while the lowest fracture resistance mean value was recorded for Celtra Duo group with 125o loading angle.
Conclusion:
1.Fracture resistance of ceramic veneers under functional Loads was higher at 60° than at 125° angle for both ceramic materials.
2.Both Celtraduo and e. max CAD laminate veneers provide clinically acceptable fracture resistance values.
Keywords
fracture resistance; E.max CAD; Celtra duo CAD; laminate veneer; ZLS
Statistics
Article View: 173
PDF Download: 135