Digital evaluation of a simplified technique for resin splinting used for multiunit implant restoration impressions: An in-vitro comparative study | ||||
Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
Article 3, Volume 68, Issue 4, October 2022, Page 3431-3441 PDF (2.21 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2022.141408.2124 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Sherif El-Dakkak ; Akram Fathy Neena | ||||
Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Objectives: This study aims to simplify the conventional resin-on-floss splinting technique and study the precision of this modified multiimplant impression technique. Material and Methods: Twenty-four (n=24) impressions were done for one mandibular completely edentulous model with six implants placed at the canines, first premolars and first molars. Group I (n=12) used the sectional resin-on-floss splinting technique. Group II (n=12) used the simplified tray-resin splint technique. The reference model and casts were scanned. Obtained STLs were aligned. Virtual implants on each cast were compared to reference model measuring angular and positional deviations. All variables and were compared at p value <.05. Results: Group I had significantly lower differences in angular deviations in vertical and horizontal axes of each implant except the left first molar implant, vertically, and the left first premolar implant, horizontally. The overall angular deviations of all implants were significantly lower in group I at the vertical axis. Group I had significantly lower positional deviations in XY axes of each implant except the left first molar implant. Group I showed significantly lower values on the left canine and left first premolar implant in the Z axis. The overall positional deviations of each implant of group I were significantly lower on the left canine and right first molar implants. The overall positional deviations of all implants were significantly lower in group I at the XY axes. Conclusions: Conventional resin-on-floss technique showed less deviation values. Values of both techniques remained within the accepted level of clinical misfit values proposed in literature. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
open tray implant impression; positional accuracy; resin-on-floss splinting; simplified splinting technique; tray-resin splinting | ||||
Statistics Article View: 113 PDF Download: 104 |
||||