Using Statistical Approach to Derive Priority Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Application to Public Investment Allocation
Soliman Mohammed, A. (2023). Using Statistical Approach to Derive Priority Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Application to Public Investment Allocation. EKB Journal Management System, 31(1), 31-53. doi: 10.21608/inp.2023.300183
Ahmed Soliman Mohammed. "Using Statistical Approach to Derive Priority Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Application to Public Investment Allocation". EKB Journal Management System, 31, 1, 2023, 31-53. doi: 10.21608/inp.2023.300183
Soliman Mohammed, A. (2023). 'Using Statistical Approach to Derive Priority Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Application to Public Investment Allocation', EKB Journal Management System, 31(1), pp. 31-53. doi: 10.21608/inp.2023.300183
Soliman Mohammed, A. Using Statistical Approach to Derive Priority Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Application to Public Investment Allocation. EKB Journal Management System, 2023; 31(1): 31-53. doi: 10.21608/inp.2023.300183

Using Statistical Approach to Derive Priority Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Application to Public Investment Allocation

المجلة المصرية للتنمية والتخطيط
Volume 31, Issue 1, March 2023, Page 31-53  XML PDF (1.74 MB)
Document Type: المقالة الأصلية
DOI: 10.21608/inp.2023.300183
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Ahmed Soliman Mohammed*
معهد التخطيط القومي
Abstract
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the most used multi-criteria techniques that can be used for decision-making problems; it depends on judgments of decision maker/expert about different alternatives using some criteria to make the best decision about these alternatives. However, the eigenvector method used for deriving the priorities in the AHP has been criticized due to its deterministic mechanism where the error in judgments is not taking into consideration. The main aims of this paper are first to discuss using of statistical method to obtain priority weights instead of the eigenvector method, and then apply this statistical method to define the priorities of regional allocation of public investment in Egypt. Seven criteria have been used in this study to judge seven alternatives (regions), where the local priority weights as well as their standard errors are calculated for the criteria and the alternatives with regard to the criteria, and then the final (global) priority weights are calculated for the alternatives. Final results of the application case revealed that regions of upper Egypt had the highest priority for investment allocation compared to the other regions.
Keywords
Decision Making; Statistical Method; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Public Investments
References
  • Alho, J. M., Knagas, J., & Kolehmainen, O. (1996). Uncertainty in Expert Predictions of the Ecological Consequences of Forest Plans. Applied Statistics, 45 (1), pp. 1-14.
  • Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS), (2011). Statistical Year Book 2021.
  • Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS), (2019). Indicators of Household Income, Expenditure and Consumption Survey.
  • Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics (CAPMAS), (2022). Annual Bulletin for Labor Force Survey 2021.
  • Crawford, G., & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the Analysis of Subjective Judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, pp. 387-405.
  • De Jong, P. (1984). A Statistical Approach to Saay's Scaling Method for Priorities. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28, pp. 467-478.
  • Egypt Adult Education Authority (EAEA), (2022). http://eaea.gov.eg/w/?page_id=111.
  • El-Hefnawy, A., & Mohamed, A.S. (2014). Review of Different Methods for Deriving Weights in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 6 (1), pp. 93-124.
  • Forman, E.H., & Gass, S.I. (2001). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Exposition. Operations Research, 49(4), pp. 469-486.
  • Laininen, P., & Hamalainen, R.P. (2003). Analyzing AHP-matrices by Regression. European Journal of Operational Research, 148, pp. 514–524.
  • Mu, E., & Pereyra-Rojas, M. (2017). Practical Decision Making: An Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Using Super Decisions v2. SpringerBriefs in Operations Research.
  • Olsson, U. (2005). Confidence Intervals for the Mean of a Log-Normal Distribution. Journal of Statistics Education, 13 (1), pp. 1069-1898.
  • Ramanujam, V., & Saaty, T.L. (1981). Technological Choice in the Less Developed Countries: An Analytic Hierarchy Approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 19, pp. 81–98.
  • Saaty, T.L. (1990). How to Make a Decision: Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operations Research (48), pp. 9-26.
  • Saaty, T.L. (1994). How to Make a Decision: Analytic Hierarchy Process. INTERFACES, 24, pp. 19-43.
  • Saaty, T.L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the Principal Eigenvector Necessary?. European Journal of Operations Research, 145, pp. 85-91.
  • Saaty, T.L., & Shih, H. (2009). Structures in Decision Making: On the Subjective Geometry of Hierarchies and Networks. European Journal of Operations Research, 199, pp. 867-872.
Statistics
Article View: 65
PDF Download: 79