Effect of Endodontic Bioceramic Sealer versus Resin Based Sealer in The Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Luted with Resin Cement to Root Dentin (An In-Vitro Study) | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Volume 69, Issue 4 - Serial Number 5, October 2023, Page 3091-3105 PDF (1.73 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2023.214531.2577 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Hadil Ahmed Sabry 1; Marwa Beleidy  2; Mostafa Shaker 3
| ||||
| 1Professor of Dental Materials, Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| 2Associate professor of Fixed Prosthodontics, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| 3Lecturer of Endodontics, Endodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Purpose: To evaluate Well-Root ST and Expoxidin Duo sealers’ contact angle, dentinal tubule penetration, and their impact on fiber post-bond strength. Materials and Methods: Fifty-eight maxillary central incisor teeth were collected and decoronated. Ten teeth were longitudinally split into 20 segments and treated with bioceramic (Well-Root ST) and epoxy resin-based (Epoxidin Duo) sealers (n=10 per group) to evaluate the contact angle. Forty-eight teeth were divided into two groups (n=24) based on the same sealers used for obturation. Both obturated teeth groups were subdivided into two subgroups based on the evaluating test; 14 specimens were assessed for dentinal tubule penetration using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and 10 specimens were restored with fiber posts and cross-sectioned to evaluate the push-out bond strength using a universal testing machine. Failure mode was determined for pushed-out slices under a SEM. Independent t-test was used to compare two different groups. One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's Post Hoc tests were used for multiple comparisons. P < 0.05 was the significance level. Results: Epoxidin Duo group showed a significantly higher contact angle (56.78 ± 0.68o) than Well-Root ST group (53.25 ± 0.25o). Well-Root ST group showed significantly higher dentinal tubule penetration (10.40 ± 1.05 µm) than Epoxidin Duo group (7.61 ± 1.08 µm). Both groups showed a non-significant push-out bond strength difference. Conclusions: Bioceramic sealer showed higher wettability and dentinal tubule penetration than epoxy resin-based sealer. However, both sealers affected the fiber post-bond strength at various regions throughout the root canal length without influencing the total bond strength. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Endodontic sealer; Fiber post; Contact angle; Dentinal tubule penetration; and Push-out bond strength | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 150 PDF Download: 120 |
||||
