Investigating Factors Influencing Willingness to Communicate in the Virtual Learning Communities among EFL Majors | ||||
التربية (الأزهر): مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية) | ||||
Volume 41, Issue 196, December 2022, Page 1101-1130 PDF (598.42 K) | ||||
Document Type: المقالة الأصلية | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/jsrep.2022.328548 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Author | ||||
أيمن شعبان خليفة أحمد | ||||
قسم المناهج وطرق التدريس (لغة إنجليزية)، كلية التربية بنين بالقاهرة، جامعة الأزهر. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
هدف البحث الحالي إلى استقصاء درجة رغبة التواصل في مجتمعات التعلم الافتراضية والعوامل المؤثرة فيها لدى طلاب شعبة اللغة الإنجليزية، كلغة أجنبية، بكلية التربية، جامعة الأزهر، ولتحقيق هدف البحث تم الاعتماد على المنهج الكمكيفي (التصميم التفسيري المتتابع)، وتمثلت عينة البحث الكمّي في١٢٥ طالبًا تم اختيارهم بطريقة عشوائية، وتمثلت أداة البحث الكمّي في استبانة، طبِّقت على العينة الكمّية لتحديد درجة رغبة التواصل لديهم في مجتمعات التعلم الافتراضية؛ كما تم اختيار عينة البحث الكيفية تم اختيارهم بطريقة العينة الأكثر ملاءمة والبالغ عددها سبعة طلاب، وتمثلت أداة البحث الكيفية في مقابلة شبه مقيدة، تم إجراؤها مع العينة الكيفية. وأسفرت نتائج البحث الكمية والكيفية عن انخفاض مستوى الرغبة في التواصل لدى الطلاب، بالإضافة إلى وجود عديد من العوامل التي تؤثر سلبًا على الرغبة في التواصل في مجتمعات التعلم الافتراضية، وأوصى البحث بضرورة إلقاء الضوء على مجتمعات التعلم الافتراضية باعتبارها إحدى بيئات التعلم الواعدة في القرن الحادي والعشرين، بالإضافة إلى حتمية تبني ممارسات التعليم والتعلم الفعال نحو زيادة الرغبة في التواصل لدى متعلمي اللغة الإنجليزية كلغة أجنبية. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
استقصاء; رغبة التواصل; مجتمعات التعلم الافتراضية | ||||
References | ||||
Alavi, S. M., & Esmaeilifard, F. (2021). The effect of emotional scaffolding on language achievement and willingness to communicate by providing recast. Cogent Psychology, 8(1), 1911093.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Group.
Alshumaimeri, Y. A., & Alhumud, A. M. (2021). EFL Students' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Virtual Classrooms in Enhancing Communication Skills. English Language Teaching, 14(11), 80-96.
Aydin, F. (2017). Willingness to Com municate (WTC) among Intermediate-level A dult Turkish EFL Learners: Underlying Factors. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(3), 109-137.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139-153.
Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness‐to‐communicate scale: Development and validation. Communications Monographs, 43(1), 60-69.
Cao, Y. (2006). Temporal fluctuation in situational willingness to communicate in a second language classroom. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 12(2). 27-45.
Carlen, U., & Jobring, O. (2005). The rationale of online learning communities. International journal of web based communities, 1(3), 272-295.
Chen G.M., & Starosta W. J. (2000). The development and validation of the intercultural communication sensitivity scale. Human Communication,3(1), 1-15.
Chia, H. P., & Pritchard, A. (2014). Using a virtual learning community (VLC) to facilitate a cross-national science research collaboration between secondary school students. Computers & Education, 79, 1-15.
Chichon, J. (2019). Factors influencing overseas learners’ Willingness to Communicate (WTC) on a pre-sessional programme at a UK university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 87-96.
Clément, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of language and social psychology, 22(2), 190-209.
Compton, L. (2004). From chatting to oral fluency: Using chat to improve self-confidence and increase willingness to communicate. Teaching English with Technology, 4(1), 9-23.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
Derwing T.M., Munro M.J., Thomson R.I. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359-380.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, language identities and the L2 self: Future research directions. Motivation, language identity and the L2 self, 350-356.
Freiermuth, M., & Jarrell, D. (2006). Willingness to communicate: can online chat help? 1. International journal of applied linguistics, 16(2), 189-212.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The internet and higher education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
Gorsky, P., & Blau, I. (2009). Online teaching effectiveness: A tale of two instructors. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3), 1-27.
Harare, S. (2019). A Comparison Between Male and Female in Their Willingness to Communicate and Use of Socio-cognitive Strategies. Philosophy, 9(7), 408-413.
Harrison, R., & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 7(2), 109-124.
Hurtado, S. S., Gonyea, R. M., Graham, P. A., & Fosnacht, K. (2020). The Relationship between residential learning communities and student engagement.
Kaplan, D. E. (2021). Virtual collaboration and communities of practice in learning and instruction. Creative Education, 12(04), 747.
Katiandagho, I. G., & Sengkey, V. G. (2022). Students’ Self-Confidence and Their Willingness to Communicate in English. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 6(1), 153-161.
Kuhn, T. S. (1999). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. China Social Sciences Publishing House.
Lee, J. S., & Lee, K. (2020). Affective factors, virtual intercultural experiences, and L2 willingness to communicate in in-class, out-of-class, and digital settings. Language Teaching Research, 24(6), 813-833.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Liu, F., Vadivel, B., Rezvani, E., & Namaziandost, E. (2021). Using games to promote English as a foreign language learners’ willingness to communicate: Potential effects and teachers’ attitude in focus. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 762447.
Liu, W., Wang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2020). An empirical study of continuous use behavior in virtual learning community. Plos one, 15(7), e0235814.
Lomicka, L. (2020). Creating and sustaining virtual language communities. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 306-313.
Lu, Y., & Hsu, C. F. (2008). Willingness to communicate in intercultural interactions between Chinese and Americans. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37(2), 75-88.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of language and social psychology, 15(1), 3-26.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in second language acquisition, 23(3), 369-388.
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.
MacIntyre, P., Baker, S., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 589-608.
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16-25.
McCroskey, J. C. (1997). Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self- perceived communication competence: Conceptualizations and perspectives. In J. A. Daly, J.C. McCroskey, J. Ayres, T. Hopf, & D. M. Ayres (Eds.). Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension, 2nd ed. (pp. 75-108).
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association. Denver.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. Southern Journal of Communication, 56(1), 72-77.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991). Quiet children and the classroom teacher. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, Indiana University, 2805 E. 10th St., Suite 150, Bloomington, IN 47408-2698.
Mehmet, S. A. K. (2020). The role of ideal L2 self in predicting L2 willingness to communicate inside and outside the classroom. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 189-203.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Mohammadi, J., Barati, H., & Youhanaee, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Using Flipped Classroom Model on Iranian EFL Learners’ English Achievements and Their Willingness to Communicate. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 101-115.
Moretti, G., & Schlemmer, E. (2012). Virtual learning communities of practice in metaverse. In Virtual worlds and metaverse platforms: new communication and identity paradigms (pp. 149-165). IGI Global.
Mulyono, H., Saskia, R., Arrummaiza, V. S., & Suryoputro, G. (2020). Psychometric assessment of an instrument evaluating the effects of affective variables on students’ WTC in face-to-face and digital environment. Cogent psychology, 7(1), 1823617.
NCSS, (2020). Chapter (208). Paired t-test. Retrieved from: https://www.ncss.com/wp-content/themes/ncss/pdf/Procedures/NCSS/Paired_T-Test.pdf
O’Toole, C. (2019). “Virtual Learning Environment Faculty Continuing Professional Development-Networked Learning Communities” A Critical Literature Review. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(1), 48-67.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
Peng, J.-E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to Communicate in English: A Model in the Chinese EFL Classroom Context. Language Learning, 60, 834-876.
Rafiee, M., & Abbasian-Naghneh, S. (2019). Prioritization of critical individual factors influencing willingness to communicate: AHP method. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(6), 461-474.
Robson, G. (2015). A Model of Situational Willingness to Communicate (WTC) in the Study Abroad Context. International Education Studies, 8(10), 114-125.
Sheybani, M. (2019). The relationship between EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate (WTC) and their teacher immediacy attributes: A structural equation modelling. Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1607051.
Solvik, R. M., & Glenna, A. E. (2021). Teachers’ potential to promote students’ deeper learning in whole-class teaching: An observation study in Norwegian classrooms. Journal of Educational Change, 1-27.
Strunga, A. (2015). The integration of virtual learning communities into universities’ knowledge management models. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2430-2434.
Suleri, J. I., & Suleri, A. J. (2019). Comparing virtual learning, classical classroom learning and blended learning. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 3(1), 1-8.
Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., & Teddlie, C. B. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (Vol. 46). Sage.
Tu, C. H. (2000). Online learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. Journal of network and computer applications, 23(1), 27-37.
Tzanavaris, S., Nikiforos, S., Mouratidis, D., & Kermanidis, K. L. (2021). Virtual Learning Communities (VLCs) rethinking: From negotiation and conflict to prompting and inspiring. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 257-278.
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65(4), 605-632.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Wegener, R., & Leimeister, J. M. (2012). Virtual learning communities: success factors and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5-6), 383-397.
Wegener, R., & Leimeister, J. M. (2012). Virtual learning communities: success factors and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5-6), 383-397.
Wisker, G. (2001). The postgraduate research handbook. Palgrave.
Xiao, L., & Huang, D. (2016). Between-team communication in the intercultural context. Information, communication & society, 19(7), 940-955.
Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2013). The impact of online learning on students’ course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system. Economics of Education Review, 37, 46-57.
Yarwood, A., & Bennett, P. A. (2022). Engendering WTC in online learning spaces: peer connectivity is more important than we may think. In Transferring Language Learning and Teaching From Face-to-Face to Online Settings (pp. 227-246). IGI Global.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54-66.
Zhang, J., Beckmann, N., & Beckmann, J. F. (2022). One situation doesn’t fit all: Variability and stability of state willingness to communicate in a Chinese College English classroom. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 504-529. | ||||
Statistics Article View: 44 PDF Download: 31 |
||||