Effect Of Three Different Bar Clip Materials on Retention of Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdenture: An Invitro Study | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Volume 70, Issue 1 - Serial Number 4, January 2024, Page 473-486 PDF (1.69 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2023.245206.2760 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
Mohamed Hosny Selem 1; Sara Ali ElKady 2; moataz Hassan 3; Iman A El-asfahani  4
| ||||
| 1Teaching Assistant, Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Nahda University | ||||
| 2Fellow of the General Organization for Teaching Hospitals and Institutes | ||||
| 3Lecturer, Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University. | ||||
| 4Associate Professor, Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry Minia university, Egypt | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The aim: To explore the effect of different bar clip materials (plastic, poly ether ether ketone (PEEK), and zirconia) on retention force with PEEK bar in implant supported mandibular overdenture using the universal testing machine. Materials and methods: A heat-cured acrylic educational model was constructed and to implants were inserted at the canine region bilaterally. A milled PEEK bar was constructed and screwed to the multiunit abutment which were screwed to the implants. Three different clip materials groups (plastic, PEEK, and zirconia) were constructed. The clips were picked up in the intaglio surface of each denture. Three wrought wires were attached to the overdenture polished surface and connected to each other at the overdenture geometric center. The retention force of each attachment was measured at T0 (insertion) followed by T1 at 360 (3 months), T2 at 720 (6 months), T3 at 1440 (one year), T4 at 2880 (2 years) and T5 at 4320 (3 years) insertion and removal cycles simulating 36 months of usage. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between clip materials at all insertion and removal cycles. The final mean retention force of the zirconia clip group was significantly lower compared to the plastic and PEEK clip groups at T5 simulating 3-year usage. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the PEEK and plastic clip materials showed significantly higher retention values compared to zirconia clip materials when used with PEEK bar-retained mandibular implant-supported overdentures after a three-year simulation of overdenture use. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Implant overdenture; bar attachment; clip material; retention | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 102 PDF Download: 59 |
||||
