Comparison of three different dental implant biological coating techniques | ||||
| Egyptian Dental Journal | ||||
| Volume 70, Issue 2 - Serial Number 4, April 2024, Page 1699-1703 PDF (1.05 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/edj.2024.264594.2894 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
Mohamed Ahmed Alkhodary  
| ||||
| Associate Professor of prosthetic dental sciences, College of Dentistry, Qassim university, KSA, Professor, department of prosthodontics, faculty of dentistry, Alexandria university, Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| ABSTRACT Introduction: Titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) surface coating with the amino acid RGD peptide was found to improves the adhesion of osteoblasts to the implant surface. This work aimed at comparing three different methods to immobilize the amino acid sequence RGD to the Ti–6Al–4V. Materials and methods: This article tested three different methods to immobilize the amino acid sequence RGD to Ti–6Al–4V) implants surface, the first method used alkane phosphonic acid and maleimide as coupling factor, the second method used a simple dip-in technique and dehydration, and the third method used a collagen coating to which the RGD was linked, then the resulting coatings were tested using the Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, and surface binding energy. Results: The FT-IR and surface binding energy indicated the first method yielded better and stronger RGD coating. Conclusion: The titanium alloy chemical coating process of the amino acid sequence RGD was found to yield better results ac compare to the dip-in and RGD-collagen linking methods. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Dental implants; biomimetic coating; RGD coating | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 22 PDF Download: 15 |
||||
