آراء طلبة مقرر طرق تدريس الحاسوب في کلية التربية الأساسية بدولة الکويت حول استخدام التعلُم النقال في التعليم الجامعي | ||||
التربية (الأزهر): مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية) | ||||
Article 13, Volume 37, 180 جزء1, October 2018, Page 559-613 PDF (446.12 K) | ||||
Document Type: بحوث فی مجال أصول التربیة والتربیة الإسلامیة | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/jsrep.2018.39198 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
محمد حمد العتل1; دلال فرحان العنزي2; عيسى حسن رمضان2 | ||||
1کلية التربية الأساسية- الکويت | ||||
2کلية التربية الأساسية – الکويت | ||||
Abstract | ||||
هدفت الدراسة إلى التعرف على آراء طلبة مقرر طرق تدريس الحاسوب في کلية التربية الأساسية بدولة الکويت حول استخدام التعلٌم النقال في التعليم الجامعي, وتکونت عينة الدراسة من (200) طالباً وطالبة من الطلبة الذين يدرسون مقرر طرق تدريس الحاسوب بکلية التربية الأساسية, واستخدمت الدراسة المنهج الوصفي التحليلي. وأظهرت نتائج الدراسة وجود فروق ذات دلالة إحصائية عند مستوى دلالة (0.05) بين متوسطات أفراد عينة الدراسة حول أسباب ظهور التعلٌم النقال وفقاً لمتغير النوع والعمر والسنة الدراسية والمعدل, ووجود فروق بين متوسطات أفراد عينة الدراسة حول ايجابيات التعلُم النقال وفقاً لمتغير النوع والعمر والسنة الدراسية والمعدل, کما أظهرت النتائج وجود فروق بين متوسطات أفراد عينة الدراسة حول استخدامات التعلُم النقال وفقاً لمتغير النوع والعمر والسنة الدراسية والمعدل, ووجود فروق بين متوسطات أفراد عينة الدراسة حول معوقات التعلُم النقال وفقاً لمتغير النوع والسنة الدراسية, بينما لا توجد فروق وفقاً لمتغير العمر والمعدل. Abstract: The study aimed to identify the views of the students of computer teaching methods’ course at the Basic Education College in the State of Kuwait regarding the reasons that led to the emergence of mobile learning, as well as the advantages of mobile learning, its uses and its obstacles. The study sample consisted of (200) male and female students who are studying the course of computer teaching methods at the Basic Education College. The study adopted the descriptive analytical approach. The study results showed that there are statistically significant differences at the level of (0.05) between the medians of the sample regarding the factors that led to the emergence of mobile learning, as well as the advantages of mobile learning according to gender, age, school year and GPA variables. The results showed differences at the level of (0.05) between the medians of the sample regarding the advantages of mobile learning, as well as the advantages of mobile learning according to gender, age, school year and GPA variables. The results also showed differences at the level of (0.05) between the medians of the sample regarding the advantages of mobile learning according to gender, age, school year and GPA variables. Moreover, the results showed differences at the level of (0.05) between the medians of the sample regarding the uses of mobile learning according to gender, age, school year and GPA variables. It also showed differences at the level of (0.05) between the medians of the sample regarding the obstaclesfacing mobile learning according to gender, age, school year and GPA variables, while it showed no differences according to age and GPA variables. | ||||
Keywords | ||||
طرق تدريس الحاسوب- کلية التربية الأساسية- التعلُم النقال; : Computer Teaching Methods – Basic Education College – Mobile Learning | ||||
References | ||||
أولاً: المراجع العربیة:
ثانیاً: المراجع الأجنبیة: 22. Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile Technologies and Learning, London, Learning and Skills Development Agency
23. Baoglu, E.B., Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1–7.
24. Behera, S.K. (2013). E and M learning comparative study, sidho-kanho-Birsha, International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4 (3), 1309-1349.
25. Chen, G.D., Chang, C.K., Wang, C.Y. (2008). Ubiquitous Learning Website: Scaffold Learners by Mobile Devices with Information-Aware Techniques, Computers & Education, 50, 77–90.
26. Chen, H.-R., Huang, H.-L. (2010). User acceptance of Mobile Knowledge Management Learning System: Design and Analysis, Educational Technology& Society, 13 (3), 70–77.
27. Corlett, D., Sharples, M., Chan, T., Bull, S. (2005) Evaluation of a mobile learning organizer for University students, Journal of computer assisted learning, 21 (3), 162-170.
28. Elhassnawi, M. A. & Saleh, M. H. (2013). The Impact of Using the Bluetooth Technology of the Mobile Phone on Students’ Achievement and their Retention of Information, Journal of Faculty of Education for Girls, (4) 24, 959- 969.
29. Hamdan, Zaina Abdel Hamid (2008). Computer information systems, Master theses, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan.
30. Jaggars, S.S., Bailey, T. (2010). Effectiveness of Fully Online Courses for College Students: Response to a Department of Education Meta-Analysis, Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
31. Jeng, Y., Wu, T., Huang, Y., Tan, Q., Yang, S. (2010). The Add-on Impact of Mobile Applications in Learning Strategies: A Review Study, Educational Technology & Society, 13 (3), 3-11.
32. Jonas-Dwyer, D., Clark, C., Celenza, T., Siddiqui, Z. (2012). Evaluating Apps for Learning and Teaching, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 7 (4), 54-57.
33. Kajumbulla, R. (2006). The effectiveness of mobile Short Messaging Service (SMS) technologies, Retrieved from: http://pcf4.dec.uwi.edu/viewpaper.
34. Keegan, D. (2005). The future of Learning: From eLearning to M- Learning, available at: http://learning.ericsson.net.
35. Keegan, D. (2005). The future of Learning: From eLearning to m- Learning, available on line at http://learning.ericsson.net.
36. Koole, M., McQuilkin, J., & Ally, M. (2010). Mobile Learning in Distance Education: Utility or Futility, Journal of Distance Education, 24 (2), 59 – 82.
37. Lan, Y., & Tsai, P. (2011). Using Mobile-Memo to Support Knowledge Acquisition and Posting- Question in a Mobile Learning Environment, Journal of US-China Education Review, 5 (1), 632- 638.
38. Mahdi, H. (2014). The Effectiveness of Mobile Learning SMS Service on Enhancing Mobile Learning Acceptance among the College of Education Students at Al-Aqsa University, 2 (1), 45-69.
39. Narayanansamy, M. & Ismail, I. (2012). Sms-Based Learning Approach to Assisting Full Time Students' In Learning, International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 2(9), 442-451.
40. Norouzi, M. & Samet, A. & Sharifuddin, R. & Hjh, D. & binti, T. & Hamid, A. (2012). Investigate the effect of mobile learning over the critical thinking in higher education, Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 6(6), 909-915.
41. Rahamat, R. & Shah, P. & Din, R. & Abd Aziz, R. (2011). Students' readiness and perceptions towards using mobile technology for learning the English language literature component, The English Teacher, (XL).
42. Sampson, D., Panagiotis, Z. (2013). Context-Aware Adaptive and Personalized Mobile Learning, Paper presented at Third International Conference of e- Learning and Distance, Riyadh, KSA.
43. Seifert, T. (2015). Teaching based augmented reality and smart phones to promote learning motivation among middle school students, 19th Annual Technology, Colleges and Community Online Conference, Retrieved from http://etec.hawaii.edu.
44. Urano, Y. (2007). Mobile phone based learning paradigms, Waseda University, Japan.
45. Vogel, D., Kennedy, D., Kuan, K., Kwok, R., Lai, J. (2007). Do Mobile Device Applications Affect Learning?, Paper presented at the 40th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
46. Wasilewska, A., Wong, J. (2009). Template Mobile Applications for Social and Educational Development, Paper presented at the International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology, Mragowo, Poland.
47. Yang, J., Lin, Y. (2010). Development and Evaluation of an Interactive Mobile Learning Environment with Shared Display Groupware, Educational Technology & Society, 13 (1), 195– 207. | ||||
Statistics Article View: 224 PDF Download: 2,304 |
||||