Impact of blast hazard on lightweight sandwich structure performance | ||||
The International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering | ||||
Article 19, Volume 11, 11PthP International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering, April 2016, Page 1-15 PDF (1.08 MB) | ||||
Document Type: Original Article | ||||
DOI: 10.21608/iccae.2016.43442 | ||||
View on SCiNiTO | ||||
Authors | ||||
Mahmoud. M. Abada1; Mostafa M. Abdel Wahab2; Sherif A. Mazek2; Mohamed H. Abdel Shafy2 | ||||
1Egyptian Armed Forces. corresponding author. | ||||
2Egyptian Armed Forces. | ||||
Abstract | ||||
Abstract . The use of explosives to attack vehicles has been increased during the last few years. The terror attacks lead to death of innocent people (civilian and military). The armored vehicles should be protected from explosives attacks using light weight sandwich structure. In this study, the protection system against blast effect is highlighted using composite structures to protect vehicles. Blast field test is expensive to conduct. The response of the light composite structure is studied using 3-D finite element analysis (FEA). The reviewed blast field test is used to verify the 3-D numerical model. The composite structure strengthened by aluminum foam (ALF) is used to protect the bottom of the armored vehicle against the blast wave propagation. The ALF is used to fill the space at the sandwich structure as a light weight material. This study presents a comparison between the results obtained by both the reviewed field blast test and the FEA to validate the accuracy of the 3-D finite element model. The effects are expressed in terms of displacement-time history effect on the sandwich steel panels as the explosive wave propagates. The results obtained by the reviewed field blast test have a good agreement with those obtained by 3-D numerical model. The ALF improves the performance of the sandwich structure under the impact of blast loading. The light weight sandwich structure could be used as mitigation system to protect the bottom of the armored vehicles against blast hazard. | ||||
Statistics Article View: 186 PDF Download: 107 |
||||