EFFECT OF TWO POLISHING TECHNIQUES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF THREE DIFFERENT DENTURE BASE MATERIALS (AN IN VITRO STUDY)
S. El-Din, M., Badr, A., Agamy, E., Mohamed, G. (2018). EFFECT OF TWO POLISHING TECHNIQUES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF THREE DIFFERENT DENTURE BASE MATERIALS (AN IN VITRO STUDY). EKB Journal Management System, 43(3), 34-40. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57990
Mai S. El-Din; Amr M. Badr; Emad M Agamy; Gehan F Mohamed. "EFFECT OF TWO POLISHING TECHNIQUES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF THREE DIFFERENT DENTURE BASE MATERIALS (AN IN VITRO STUDY)". EKB Journal Management System, 43, 3, 2018, 34-40. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57990
S. El-Din, M., Badr, A., Agamy, E., Mohamed, G. (2018). 'EFFECT OF TWO POLISHING TECHNIQUES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF THREE DIFFERENT DENTURE BASE MATERIALS (AN IN VITRO STUDY)', EKB Journal Management System, 43(3), pp. 34-40. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57990
S. El-Din, M., Badr, A., Agamy, E., Mohamed, G. EFFECT OF TWO POLISHING TECHNIQUES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF THREE DIFFERENT DENTURE BASE MATERIALS (AN IN VITRO STUDY). EKB Journal Management System, 2018; 43(3): 34-40. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57990

EFFECT OF TWO POLISHING TECHNIQUES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF THREE DIFFERENT DENTURE BASE MATERIALS (AN IN VITRO STUDY)

Alexandria Dental Journal
Article 6, Volume 43, Issue 3, December 2018, Page 34-40  XML PDF (367 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2018.57990
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mai S. El-Din1; Amr M. Badr2; Emad M Agamy3; Gehan F Mohamed4
1Clinical Instructor at removable proshodontics department, faculty of dentistry. Alexandria University. Alexandria. Egypt.
2- Assistant professor of removable proshodontics, faculty of dentistry. Minia University. Minia. Egypt.
3Professor of removable proshodontics and head of the department, faculty of dentistry. Minia University. Minia. Egypt
4Professor of removable proshodontics and dean of faculty of dentistry. Minia University. Minia. Egypt.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A direct link was found between surface roughness, the accumulation of plaque and the adherence of microorganisms concerning acrylic resins. However, the surface properties of the new thermoplastic materials remain questionable especially after using the conventional finishing and polishing techniques. Studying surface properties of each material makes the recommendation of the proper techniques easier. OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study intended to compare three types of denture base materials in regarding to the effect of different polishing techniques on their surface roughness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 36 specimens were incorporated in this study. 12 specimens were in each group. 3 groups were formed: Group A: Heat cured Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Group B: Thermoplastic Polyamides. Group C: Thermoplastic Acetal. Dimensions of specimens were (20×20×3 mm) with projection at the side. Statistical analysis was carried out using two way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance was defined at P≤0.05. RESULTS: Technique no. 1 showed a high significant value in compared to technique no.2 for polishing the tested materials. CONCLUSIONS: PMMA was the highest affected group followed by thermoplastic acetal and the last affected group was thermoplastic polyamide. Prepolishing rubberizing with rubber bur improves the polishing procedure. RESULTS: Remarkable improvement in the histology and the ultrastructure of the alveolar bone of rats in Group III was observed. Moreover, hematological values revealed significant decrease in the inflammatory condition of rats with induced RA after fish oil treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatoid arthritis is an important risk factor for alveolar bone loss. The treatment of the RA induced rats with fish oil not only prevented the alveolar bone resorption and stimulated new bone formation, but also reduced relatively the level of rheumatoid factor in the blood.
Keywords
Polymethylmethacrylate. Polyamides. Acetal. Surface roughness. Finishing. Polishing
References
  1. Yamauchi M, Yamamoto K, Wakabayashi M, Kawano J. In vitro adherence of microorganisms to denture base resin with different surface texture. Dent Mater J. 1990; 9: 19-4.
  2. Radford DR, Sweet SP, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Adherence of Candida albicans to denture base materials with different surface finishes. J Dent. 1998; 26: 577-83.
  3. Barbeau J et al. Reassessing the presence of Candida albicans in denture-related stomatitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 95: 51-9.
  4. Nevzatoglu EU, Ozcan M, Kulak-Ozkan Y, Kadir T. Adherence of Candida albicans to denture base acrylics and silicone-based resilient liner materials with different surface finishes. Clin Oral Investig. 2007; 11: 231-6.
  5. Kawai K, Uranom Ebisus. Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria arc their synthesis glucan. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83: 664-7.
  6. Verran J, Maryan CJ. Retention of Candida Albicans on acrylic resin and silicon of different surface topography. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 77: 535-9.
  7. Taylor R, Maryan CJ, Veran J. Retention of oral microorganisms on cobalt-chromium alloy and dental acrylic resin with different surface finishes. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80: 592-7.
  8. Berger JC, Driscoll CF, Romberg E. Surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins after processing and after polishing. J Prosthodont. 2006; 15: 180-6.
  9. Bollen CML, Papaioannou W, van Eldere J, Schepers E, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996; 7: 201-11.
  10. Quirynen M, Bollen CML, Papaioannou W, van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11: 169-78.
  11. Bollen CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997; 13: 258-69.
  12. Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51: 379-97.
  13. Kuhar M, Funduk N. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 76-85. 14.
  14. Ulusoy M, Ulusoy N, Aydin AK. An evaluation of polishing techniques on surface roughness of heat and cold-cured acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56: 107-12.
  15. Quirynen M, Marechal M, Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, Darius PL, Van Steenberghe D. The influence of surface-free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. An in vivo study in man. J Clin Periodontol. 1990; 17: 138-44.
  16. Célia M et al. Surface roughness of acrylic resins processed by microwave energy and polished by mechanical and chemical process. Braz J Oral Sci. 2006; 5: 977-81.
  17. Mohammed Q Al-Rifaiy et al. The effect of mechanical and chemical polishing techniques on the surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2010; 22: 13–7.
  18. Abuzar MA et al. Evaluating surface roughness of a polyamide denture base material in comparison with poly (methyl methacrylate). Journal of Oral Science. 2010; 52: 577-81. 19.
  19. Munns D. Nylon as a denture base material. Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1962; 13: 142-6.
  20. Hargreaves AS. Nylon as a denture-base material. Dent Pract Dent Rec. 1991; 22: 122-8.
  21. Maha A Mekkawy, Lamis A Hussein, Mohamed A. Alsharawy. Comparative study of surface roughness between polyamide, thermoplastic polymethyl methacrylate and acetal resins flexible denture base materials before and after polishing. Life Sci J. 2015; 12: 90-5.
  22. Fitton JS, Davies EH, Howlett JA, Pearson GJ. The physical properties of a polyacetal denture resin. Clin Mater. 1994; 17: 125-9.
  23. Irina Grădinaru et al. Contemporary therapeutic decisions in the treatment of various types of edentation. Romanian journal of oral rehabilitation. 2016; 8: 44-50.
  24. Mustafa MJ, Amir HM. Evaluation of Candida albicans attachment to flexible denture base material (valplast) and heat cure acrylic resin using different finishing and polishing techniques. Journal of Bagh College Dentistry. 2011; 23: 36-41.
  25. AL-Musawi RM. Evaluation of glycerin as a separating medium for processing acrylic denture base materials. (Comparative study). M. tech. Thesis, Dental Technologies in the College of Health and Medical Technology. Iraq 2005.
  26. Hanna BA, Abd Al-Majeed AE, AbdulRazaak W. Effect of Different Dental Materials on the Surface Roughness of Acrylic Resin (A comparative in vitro study). MDJ. 2008; 5: 281-5.
  27. Raya Jawad. Evaluation of the effect of hypochlorite cleanser on water sorption and solubility of flexible and conventional hot – cure – acrylic denture base. (A comparative study). MDJ. 2014; 11: 31-42.
  28. Bayan S. Khalaf , Shorouq M. Abass, Tameem Kh. Jassim. Dimensional stability of heat-activated acrylic resin at different time intervals by different flask cooling methods. MDJ. 2008; 5: 274-80.
  29. Parvizi A, Lindquist T, Schneider R, et al. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of injection molded denture base materials to that of conventional pressurepack acrylic resin. J Prosthodont. 2004; 13: 83-9.
  30. Stafford GD, Bates JF, Huggett R, Handly RW. A review of the properties of some denture base polymers. J Dent. 1986; 8: 292-4.
  31. Carl F, Sand D, Masri RM. Single maxillary complete denture. DCNA. 2004; 48: 567-84.
  32. Kunwarjeet Singh, Nidhi Gupta. Injection Molding Technique for Fabrication of Flexible Prosthesis from Flexible Thermoplastic Denture base Materials. World Journal of Dentistry. 2012; 3: 303-7.
  33. Deniz Şen, Gültekin Göller, Halim Ìşsever. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins. JPD. 2002; 88: 527-32.
  34. Duggineni Chalapathi Rao, N Kalavathy, HS Mohammad, A Hariprasad, C Ravi Kumar. Evaluation of the surface roughness of three heat-cured acrylic denture base resins with different conventional lathe polishing techniques: A comparative study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015; 15: 374-80.
  35. Srividya S, Chandrasekharan K Nair, Jayakar Shetty. Effect of Different Polishing Agents on Surface Finish and Hardness of Denture Base Acrylic Resins: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2011; 11: 7- 11.
  36. Tatiana Pereira-Cenci. Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury. Wim Crielaard. Jacob Martien ten Cate. Development of candida-associated denture stomatitis: new insights. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008; 16: 86-94.
  37. Philips RW. Science of Dental Materials. 9th edition. 1992.
  38. Busscher HJ. Vanpelt AWJ. Deboer P. Dejong HP. Arends J. The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured contact angles of liquids. Colloids and surfaces. 1984; 9: 319-31.
  39. Mahroo Vojdani A. Rashin Giti. Polyamide as a Denture Base Material: A Literature Review”. J Dent Shiraz UnivMed Sci. 2015; 16: 1-9.
  40. Ewa Sobolewska. Bogumiła Frączak. Danuta Czarnomysy Furowicz. Halina eychmielewska. Jolanta Karakulska.Bacteria adhesion to the surface of various prosthetics materials. Annales academiae medicae stetinensis. 2007; 53: 68-71.
Statistics
Article View: 507
PDF Download: 1,462