COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ARTHROCENTESIS WITH OR WITHOUT USING PIROXICAM IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDERS | ||||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||||
| Article 5, Volume 40, Issue 2, December 2015, Page 160-165 PDF (878.89 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.59142 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| S.N AL-Said; N Shawky* ; H.R Ragab* | ||||
| B.D.S. Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| pain and dysfunction including limitation of mandibular movement. Arthrocentesis is joint lavage which washes out these inflammatory mediators, thereby, relieving pain. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of arthrocentesis with and without the injection of piroxicam on TMD. Materials and methods: This study was conducted on twenty patients with clinical and radiological diagnosis of TMD included in the study divided into equal groups. Ten patients were subjected to conventional arthrocentesis with saline solution alone, other ten patients underwent arthrocentesis by injection of piroxicam. Patient's evaluation will be preoperatively and postoperatively following the procedure and after 1st, 2nd week, 1 and 6 months. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in both groups before starting the treatment. Results: Evaluation of assisted and unassisted mouth opening showed increase at all time intervals. There was significant improvement in pain, range of motion, joint effusion and joint sounds. Conclusion: Arthrocentesis combined with piroxicam injections is superior to arthrocentesis alone in reducing impairment in patients with TMD on its clinical outcome. | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| Arthocentesis; intra-articlar; Injection; temporomandibular joint dysfunction | ||||
| References | ||||
|
1. Choi BH, Yoo JH, Lee WY. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging before and after non surgical treatment of closed lock. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994; 78: 301-5.
2. Bailey MM, Wang L, Bode CJ, Mitchell KE, Detamore MS. A comparison of human umbilical cord matrix stem cells and temporomandibular joint condylar chondrocytes for tissue engineering temporomandibular joint condylar cartilage. Tissue Eng 2007; 13: 2003-10.
3. Okeson JP. Bell’s Orofacial Pains. 5th ed. Chicago: Quintessence, 1995. P 123-33.
4. Yeung RWK, Xia JJ, Samman N. Image-guided minimally invasive surgical access to the temporomandibular joint: A preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 1546-52.
5. Miloro M, Ghali GE, Peter EL, Peter DW. Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2nd ed. London: BC Decker Inc Hamilton, 2004. P 963-89.
6. Wadhwa S, Kapila S. TMJ disorders: future innovations in diagnostics and therapeutics. J Dent Educ 2008; 72: 930-47.
7. Examination, diagnosis, management TMJ disorders: a report of the president’s conference. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 66: 75.
8. Peagle D, Holmund A, Hjerpe A. Expression of peotoglycan mRNA in patients with painful clinking and chronic closed lock of TMJ. Int J Oral maxillofac Surg 2005; 34: 656-8.
9. Fonseca R, Marciani R, Turvey T. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis (MO): Saunders, Elsevier, 2009. P 815, 833.
10. Hosaka H, Murakami K, Goto K, Iizuka T. Outcome of arthrocentesis for temporomandibular joint with closed lock at 3 years follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 501-4.
11. Nishimura M, Segami N, Kaneyama K, Suzuki T. Prognostic factors in arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: Evaluation of 100 patients with internal derangement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59: 874-7.
12. Nitzan DW, Samson B, Better H. Long-term outcome of arthrocentesis for sudden-onset, persistent, severe closed lock of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55: 151-7.
13. Kaneyama K, Segami N, Nishimura M, Sato J, Fujimura K, Yoshimura H. The Ideal lavage volume of Bradykinin, Interleukin 6 and protein from the temporomandibular Joint by arthrocentesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62: 657-61.
14. Al-Belasy FA, Dolwick MF. Arthrocentesis for the treatment of temporomandibular joint closed lock: A review article. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36: 773-82.
15. Ethunandan M, Wilson AW. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis-more questions than answers? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 952-5.
16. Ishimaru JI, Ogi N, Mizui T, Miyamoto K, Shibata T, Kurita K. Effects of a single arthrocentesis and a COX2 inhibitor on disorders of temporomandibular joints. A preliminary clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 41: 323-8.
17. Dionne RA, Berthold CW. Therapeutic uses of nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug in dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001; 12: 315-30.
18. Gert S, Hans K, Josef S. MRI imaging of the TMJ: MRI diagnosis and intraoperative findings. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 1993; 21: 284-8.
19. Rűdiger E, Stefan G, Thomas E. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of internal derangement, osteoarthrosis, effusion and bone marrow edema before and after performance of arthrocentesis and hydraulic distension of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 2006; 101: 784-90.
20. William C, Marianne P, Lewis R. A modified auriculotemporal nerve block for regional anesthesia of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 42: 544-5.
21. Carvajal W, Laskin DM. Long-term evaluation of arthracentesis for the treatment of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 852-5.
22. Venancio RA, Camparis CM, Lizarelli RZ. Low intensity laser therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a double-blind study. J Oral Rehabilitation 2005; 32: 800-7.
23. Abd-Ul-Salam H, Weinberg S, Kryshtalskyj B. The incidence of reoperation after temporomandibular joint arthroscopic surgery: a retrospective study of 450 consecutive joints. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93: 408-11.
24. Matsuka Y, Yatani H, Kuboki T, Yamashita A. Temporomandibular disorders in the adult population of Okayama City, Japan. Cranio 1996; 14: 158-62.
25. Gesch D, Bernhardt O, Alte D, Schwahn C, Kocher T, John U, et al. Prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in an urban and rural German population: results of a population-based Study of Health in Pomerania. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 143-50.
26. Nitzan DW, Dolwick MF, Martinez GA. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: A simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49: 1163-7.
27. Guo C, Shi Z, Revington P. Arthrocentesis and lavage for treating temporomandibular joint disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 4: CD004973.
28. Abdel Hamid HA. Evaluation of the effectiveness of low intensity laser therapy after arthrocentesis in treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders. M.Sc. Thesis. Alexandria University. 2010.
29. Nabil L. Clinical Assessment of Arthrocentesis using ozonized water with sodium hyaluronate injection in management of TMJ Disorders. Master Thesis. Alexandria University. 2008.
30. Upton LG, Wijeyesakere SJ. The incidence of tinnitus in people with disorders of the temporomandibular joint. Int Tinnitus J 2004; 10: 174-6.
31. Kaneyama K, Segami N, Nishimura M, Suzuki T, Sato J. Importance of proinflammatory cytokines in synovial fluid from 121 joints with temporomandibular disorders. Br J Oral Maxillofacial Surgery 2002; 40: 418-23.
| ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 202 PDF Download: 870 |
||||
