EVALUATION OF BASAL DENTAL IMPLANTS IN EDENTULOUS POSTERIOR MAXILLARY REGION
Gaber, A., Eldibany, R., El-Halawani, G. (2020). EVALUATION OF BASAL DENTAL IMPLANTS IN EDENTULOUS POSTERIOR MAXILLARY REGION. EKB Journal Management System, 45(1), 14-20. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.79870
Ayman E. Gaber; Riham M. Eldibany; Gaafar N. El-Halawani. "EVALUATION OF BASAL DENTAL IMPLANTS IN EDENTULOUS POSTERIOR MAXILLARY REGION". EKB Journal Management System, 45, 1, 2020, 14-20. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.79870
Gaber, A., Eldibany, R., El-Halawani, G. (2020). 'EVALUATION OF BASAL DENTAL IMPLANTS IN EDENTULOUS POSTERIOR MAXILLARY REGION', EKB Journal Management System, 45(1), pp. 14-20. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.79870
Gaber, A., Eldibany, R., El-Halawani, G. EVALUATION OF BASAL DENTAL IMPLANTS IN EDENTULOUS POSTERIOR MAXILLARY REGION. EKB Journal Management System, 2020; 45(1): 14-20. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.79870

EVALUATION OF BASAL DENTAL IMPLANTS IN EDENTULOUS POSTERIOR MAXILLARY REGION

Alexandria Dental Journal
Article 3, Volume 45, Issue 1, April 2020, Page 14-20  XML PDF (394.28 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.79870
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ayman E. Gaber email 1; Riham M. Eldibany2; Gaafar N. El-Halawani3
1B.D.S Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
2Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
3Lecturer of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tooth replacement with dental implants has proven to be a reliable and effective means of restoring the dentition. The use of implant can conserve sound tooth by reducing the need to prepare adjacent teeth as abutment. Owing to mechanical and anatomic difficulties, implant treatment in the posterior maxilla represents a challenge due to several factors such as: type of bone, bone density and pneumatization of maxillary sinus.
OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the delayed placement of basal dental implants in the posterior maxillary region.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research conducted on 14 patients with missing maxillary posterior teeth. Panoramic x-ray together with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) were done preoperatively before placement of the basal dental implants. Stability of the implants were measured by periotest immediately, 1 month postoperatively and 3months postoperatively and CBCT were done immediately following implants insertion and after 3 months.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in the implant stability readings using periotest at one month and 3 months postoperatively and The mean bone density showed a statistically significant difference between immediate postoperative and at 3month
CONCLUSIONS: The use of Basal dental implants in atrophic posterior maxilla provides clinicians with a more conservative option of the treatment and help to minimize treatment duration, cost and trauma.
Keywords
Dental implants; stability; maxillary posterior region; basal implants
References
  1. Caudry S, Landzberg M. Lateral window sinus elevation technique: Managing Chal‐lenges and complications. J Can Dent Assoc. 2013; 79: 101–102.
  2. Misch CE. Bone classification, training keys to implant success. Dent Today. 1989; 8:39–44.
  3. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000. 2008; 47:51–66.
  4. Lemons JE. Biomaterials, biomechanics, tissue healing, and immediate function dental implants. J Oral Implantol. 2004; 5:318-24.
  5. Kopp CD. Overdentures and Osseo integration: Case studies and treatment planning. Dent Clin North Am. 1990; 34:729-39.
  6. Rosales-Leal JI, Rodríguez-Valverde MA, Mazzaglia G. Effect of roughness, wettability and morphology of engineered titanium surfaces on osteoblast-like cell adhesion. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2010; 365:222–9.
  7. Ponsonnet L, Reybier K, Jaffrezic N. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour. Mater Sci Eng C 2003; 23:551–60.
  8. Sollazzo V, Pezzetti F, Scarano A. Zirconium oxide coating improves implant osseointegration in vivo. Dental Mater. 2008; 24:357–61.
  9. Yadav R S, Sangur R, Mahajan T, Rajanikant A V, Singh N, Singh R. An Alternative to Conventional Dental Implants: Basal Implants. Rama Univ J Dent Sci, 2015; 2:22-28.
  10. Soardi CM, Spinato S, Zaffe D, Wang HL. Atrophic maxillary floor augmentation by mineralized human bone allograft in sinuses of different size: a histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22:560-6.
  11. Glauser R, Zembic A, Ruhstaller P, Windisch S. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominately in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 59- 68.
  12. Kim SJ, Kim MR, Rim JS, Chung SM, Shin SW. Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18:415-20
  13. Misch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E, Misch-Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior oartial edentulism A multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodntol 2006; 77: 1340-7.
  14. Rios HF, Avila G, Galindo P, Bratu E, Wang HL. The influence of remaining alveolar bone upon lateral window sinus augmentation implant survival. Implant Dent 2009; 18: 402-12.
  15. Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzek G, Palmer G. To graft or not to graft? Evidence-based guide to decision making in oral bone graft surgery. In: Zorzi A, Batista de Miranda J, eds. Bone Grafting. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2012:159-182.
  16. Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol. 2000; 5:22-31.
  17. Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, WatzekG. Success of 1,920 IMZ implants followed for up to 100 months. IntJOralMaxillo facImplants.1996; 11:581-88.
  18. Bilhan H, Cilingir A, Bural C, Bilmenoglu C, Sakaro O, Geckilio.The evaluation of the reliability of periotest for implant stability measurments: an in vitro study. J.Oral. Implantology.2014; 54: 232-8.
  19. German Gomez-Roman, Dieter Lukas. Influence of the implant abutment on the periotest value: An in vivo study. Quintessence int.2001; 32: 797-799.
  20. O’Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Jagger D, Meredith N. A comparison of two methods of enhancing implant primary stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004; 6: 48-57.
  21. Yoon HG, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Lee SY. Effect of bone quality and implant surgical technique on implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. J Adv Prosthodont 2011; 3: 10-5.
  22. Markovic A, Calasan D, Colic S, Stojcev-Stajcic L, JanjicB, Misic T. Implant stability in posterior maxilla: bone condensing versus bone-drilling: a clinical study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.2011; 12: 557-63.
  23. Kong, L., Liu, B.L., Hu, K.J., Li, D.H., Song, Y.L.,Ma, P. & Yang, J. optimized thread pitch design and stress analysis of the cylinder screwed dental implant. 2006; 24: 509–15.
  24. Chaytor DV, Zarb GA, Schmitt A, Lewis DW. The longitudinal effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study: bone level changes. Int J Periodont Restorative Dent 1991: 11: 113-125.
  25. Armitage GC, Svanberg GK, Löe H. Microscopic evaluation of clinical measurements of connective tissue attachmentlevels. J ClinPeriodontol 1977; 4:173–90.
  26. Magnusson I, Listgarten MA. Histological evaluation of probing depth following periodontal treatment. J ClinPeriodontol 1980; 7:26–31.
  27. Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 55-77.
  28. Cassetta M, Sofan AA, Altieri F, Barbato E. Evaluation of alveolar cortical bone thickness and density for orthodontic mini-implant placement. J Clin Exp Dent 2013; 5: 245-52.
  29. Nesir R, Bischof M, Vazquez L, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting material: A 1-year prospective pilot study with ITI impalnts. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 679-86.
  30. Yunus B. Assessment of the increased calcification of the jaw bone with CT-Scan after dental implant placement. Imaging Sci Dent 2011; 41: 59-62.
Statistics
Article View: 282
PDF Download: 693