A STUDY ON MECHANIZATION OF AERATION IN TURFGRASS | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 1, Volume 34, Issue 1, January 2017, Page 1-14 PDF (865.43 K) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2017.96867 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| H. A. FOUAD1; S. DESOKY2; R. A. WERBY2; H. A. A. SAYED3 | ||||
| 1Prof. Emt. of Agric. power and mach. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Agric. Eng., Al-Azhar Univ., Egypt. | ||||
| 2Assoc. prof. of Agric. power and mach. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Agric. Eng., Al-Azhar Univ., Egypt. | ||||
| 3Demons. of Agric. power and mach. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Agric. Eng.,. Al-Azhar Univ., Egypt. This study is a part of outcomes from (MSc thesis). | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| The objective of the present work was to develop and evaluate aeration machine for turfgrass to make under Egyptian condition. The aeration machine was evaluated versus two holes density (24 and 48 hole/m2), two hollow tine diameters (2.5 and 3 cm), three average depths of aeration (4, 6 and 8 cm) and four forward speeds (2, 2.7, 3.6 and 4 km/h). After 7 days from aeration operation the results showed that the lower bulk density and penetration resistance values was 0.960 g/cm3 and 154 kPa, respectivaly opposite it the higher porosity and void ratio values were 65.09% and 1.865, respectively at 48 hole/m2 holes density, 3 cm tine diameter, 8 cm depth of hole and forward speed 2 km/h comparing with control 1.271 g/cm3, 337 kPa, 53.79% and 1.164 for density, penetration resistance, porosity and void ratio, respectively. The higher actual field capacity was (0.941 fed/h) at 24 hole/m2 holes density, 2.5 cm tine diameter, 4 cm depth of hole and forward speed 4 km/h. The lower energy required was 16.223 kw.h/fed, at 24 hole/m2 holes density, 2.5 cm tine diameter, 4 cm depth of hole and forward speed 4 km/h. | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Abrougui, K.; S., Chehaibi; and M., Khelifi (2012). Impact of Mechanical Aeration on the Soil Resistance to Penetration and Density of Grassy Sward. Journal of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, A1:683-687.
Beard, J.B. (1973). Turfgrass science and culture. Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood cliffs, New Jersey. USA, P:658.
Binns, D.J. (2001). Aeration-Essential disruption. Turfgrass Bulletin, 211:9-12.
Embaby, A.T. (1985). A comparison of the different mechanization system for career crop production. Master of science thesis, agriculture engineering department, Faculty of agriculture, Cairo University.
Fontanier, C.H.; K., Steinke; J.C., Thomas; and R.H., White (2011). Effects of venting aeration on neglected bermudagrass putting greens. Applied Turfgrass Science., ATS-2011-1201-01-RS.
Larson, W.E.; A., Eynard; A., Hadas; and J., Lipiec (1994). Control and avoidance of soil compaction in practice. Soil compaction in crop production, P:597-625.
Lodge, G.M.; G.G., Robinson; and P.C., Simpson (1990). Grasses-native and naturalized value, distribution. Agfact., P:25-32.
Morad, M.M.; U.A., Kadour; and M.K., Afify (2003). Fabrication and manufacturing of a sod cutting machine. The 11th Annual Conference of the Society of the Ag. Eng 15-16 October:394-397.
Pessarakli, M. (2007). Hand Book of Turfgrass Management and Physiology. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, P:141,143,135,136.
Zontek, S.J. (2002). So similar yet so different - golf course management in the UK and the USA. International Turfgrass Bulletin, P:11-13. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 146 PDF Download: 174 |
||||
