EFFECT OF MIXING BANANA PEELS WITH FRISH CATTLE MANURE ON BIOGAS PRODUCTION | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 14, Volume 32, Issue 4, October 2015, Page 1641-1654 PDF (1.15 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2015.97784 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Author | ||||
| M. A. Rashwan | ||||
| Assist. Prof., Ag. and Biosystems Eng. Dept., Fac. of Ag. (El-Shatby), Alexandria Univ. Egypt. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| Egypt is an agricultural country and has a big potential of biogas generation from different types of wastes. Producing of biogas from agricultural wastes gives new and clean energy and good organic fertilizer as a method to protect environment from pollution by wastes. The digestion of banana peels mixed with cow dung for biogas production at laboratory scale was the subject of this investigation. Laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the biogas production from mixing banana peels fruits with fresh cattle manure in order to explore their potential application in biogas production. The study was carried out at a control temperature of 35±2oC for a period of 57 days with a total solid concentration of 8% in each reactor. The biogas and methane produced were collected by water displacement method. In the current work, four reactors were used: A, B, C and D contains 0, 20, 40 and 60% banana peels (by weight) mixed with fresh cattle manure respectively. The experiments run out in anaerobic system under control of temperature. The results showed that mixing banana peels ratio of 40% increase biogas production but increasing the ratio to 60 % or more cause decreasing in biogas production. | ||||
| References | ||||
|
Anonymous, 1998. ASAE Standards. S269.4 Cubes, Pellets and Crumbles-Definitions and Methods for Determining Density, Durability and Moisture content ASAE DEC96. Standard S358.2 Moisture Measurement-forages. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.
AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, USA.
Badger, CM. Bogue MJ, Stewart DJ., 1979. Biogas production from crops and organic wastes. New Zeland Journal of Science, 22: pp. 11~20.
Budiyono, I. N., S. J. Widiasa, and Sunarso, 2010. The Influence of Total Solid Contents on Biogas Yield from Cattle Manure Using Rumen Fluid Inoculum, International Journal of Engineering, Science Publications IJE TRANSACTIONS B: Applications Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 177~184.
David J. Hills, David W. Roberts, 1981. Anaerobic digestion of dairy manure and field crop residues, Volume 3, Issue 3, July 1981, Pages 179~189.
Deublein, D. and A. Steinhauser 2008. Biogas from waste and renewable resources. Weinheim, Willey-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Emmanuel E. S., A. M. Mshandete and A. K. Kivaisi, 2014. Biovalorization of Banana waste: Auditing and improvement of bio-methane production by fungal pre-treatment, Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences, An International Peer Review E-3 Journal of Sciences, Nov. 2013–Jan. 2014, Vol. 4, No. 1; pp. 818~833.
FAO, 1992. Biogas processes for sustainable development Uri Marchaim MIGAL Galilee Technological Centre Kiryat Shmona, Israel.
Garba, B., A. A. Zuru and A. S. Sambo, 1996. Effect of slurry concentration on biogas production from cattle dung. Nigerian Journal of Renewable Energy 4(2): pp. 38~43.
Hobson, P.N., 1983. The kinetics of anaerobic digestion of farm waste. J. Chem. technology biotechnology 33:1~20.
Khalid S. M., A. S. Fatma and M. B. Hassan, 2010. Banana-Growing tissue and its Impact on the Economic Return per Fedden in Egypt, Nature and Science, 2010-8(10), pp. 267~273.
Latika Bhatia, Sonia Johri and Rumana Ahmad, 2012. An economic and ecological perspective of ethanol production from renewable agro waste: a review, AMB Express, vol. 2, pp. 2~19.
Loehr, R. C., 1984. Pollution control for agriculture. (2nd edn), Academic Press, New York.
Maishanu S.M. and H.B.N. Hussani, 1991. Studies on factors affecting biogas generation from Pistia stratiote. The 32nd annual conference of Nigeria society for Microbiology, university of Ilorin, April, 7-11, 1991.
Mohapatra D., S. Mishra and N. Sutar, 2010. Banana and its by-product utilization: an overview, J. sci. Ind. Res.; 69 (5), 323~329.
Muhammed T. K., M. Claudia, A. Dimitrios, B. Mathieu, M. Joachim, 2009. Anaerobic digestion of banana waste, a potential source of energy in Uganda, biophysical and socio-economic frame conditions for the sustainable management of natural resources. October 6-8, Hamburg.
NCAR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Climate Research, Climates of the future; 2008.
NNFCC., (2011). National Non-Food Crops Centre. Renewable Fuels and Energy Factsheet: Anaerobic Digestion.
Ponsá S., I. Ferrer, F. Vázquez, X. Font, 2008. "Optimization of the hydrolytic-acidogenic anaerobic digestion stage (55 °C) of sewage sludge: Influence of pH and solid content." Water Res 42(14): 3972~3980.
Rashwan, M. A., H. A. Elsoury, A. I. A. Omara, 2013: Effect of total solids content on biogas production in a family scale biogas digester, Misr Journal of Agric. Eng., Vol. 30-No. (4) October 2013. pp.1195~1210.
Shaban D. Abou Hussein and M. S. Omaima, 2010. The Utilization of Agricultural Waste as One of the Environmental Issues in Egypt (A Case Study), Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 6(8): 1116~1124.
Tsunatu D. Yavini, I. Chia Azuaga, and A. John, 2014. Evaluation of the Effect of Total Solids Concentration on Biogas Yields of Agric. Wastes, Chemistry Dept., Taraba State University, P.M.B 1167, Jalingo – Taraba State, Available online at: www.isca.in, www.isca.me, Int. Research J. of Environment Sciences, ISSN 2319–1414 Vol. 3(2), 70~75.
Uzodinma, E.O. and A.U. Ofoefule, 2008. Effect of abattoir cow liquor waste on biogas yield of some agroindustrial waste. Scientific Research and Essay, 3 (10): 473~478.
Veeken A, and B. Hamelers, 1999. Effect of temperature on hydrolysis rates of selected biowaste components. Biores Technol., 69:249-254. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 264 PDF Download: 337 |
||||
