PREDICTION TO EVALUATE THE EFFICIENCY PERFORMANCE OF SOME SOIL PREPARATION EQUIPMENT | ||||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||||
| Article 1, Volume 32, Issue 3, July 2015, Page 941-954 PDF (1.09 MB) | ||||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2015.97898 | ||||
 View on SCiNiTO | ||||
| Authors | ||||
| L. A. Al-Hashimy1; H. A. Jebur1; A. A. Jasim2 | ||||
| 1Lecturer, Dept. of Ag. Machines and Equipment, Coll. of Ag., Baghdad Univ., Iraq. | ||||
| 2Prof., Dept. of Ag. Machines and Equipment, Coll. of Ag., Baghdad Univ., Iraq. | ||||
| Abstract | ||||
| An experiment was conducted on a farm at the College of Agriculture – University of Baghdad in a silty clay loam soil. “New Holland" tractor was used with the following equipment (rotary harrow, spring spike tooth harrow, disk harrow, disk ridger, ditcher and land plane) as a machinery unit. Studied treatments were laid out using split plot with a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The experiment consisted of two factors, the first included harrow types: rotary, spring spike tooth and disk harrow which represented main plots. The second factor included special equipment types: disk ridger, ditcher and land plane which represented sub plots. Effective field capacity, fuel consumption, soil disturbed volume, Energy requirements, slippage percentage as well as equipment effective depth was determined in this experiment. Results obtained indicated that land plane highest rate of field capacity (1.40 ha / hour) and less depth treatment averaged (16.26 cm) and the lowest rate of energy requirements (72.53 kW. h / ha) and the highest rate of the soil disturbed volume (2276.70 m 3 / h), while ditcher recorded lowest rate of field capacity (0.65 ha / hour) and the highest rate of energy requirements (148.54 kW. h / ha) and the highest rate of fuel consumption (32.15 L / h). the highest rate of the depth of treatment (18.92 cm) and the lowest rate for the soil disturbed volume ( 1224.87 m 3 / h) and the highest slippage percentage (10.40%). Superiority in disk ridger recorded the lowest rate of fuel consumption (28.88 L / h) and the lowest slippage percentage (8.09%). Research indicated that disk ridger was the best in the fuel consumption rate and the lowest slippage percentage, while the land plane was the best in the field capacity rate and the lowest rate of energy requirements and the highest rate of the soil disturbed volume. To relate the changes in the soil disturbed volume (Sdv), fuel consumption (Fc), slip (S) and energy requirements (Er) with special equipment (SE), and harrow equipment (Ɛ), a regression analysis was carried out, and the predictive regression equation was obtained as in the following table: Predictive Regression equation R2 Fc = 0.001639 SE + 0.63 Ɛ + 29.1610 0.87 S = - 0.00591 SE + 0.31166 Ɛ + 8.664487 0.90 | ||||
| Keywords | ||||
| soil-working equipment; land plane; fuel consumption | ||||
| References | ||||
|
العوضی’ م.ن., م.م مصطفى, ع. الجندی, م.م حجازی, .(2014). مقدمة فی الهندسة الزراعیة. ک. الزراعة- ج.عین شمس: جزء الآلات والمیکنة. أ.د نبیل العوضی 40:7. Abbaspour-Gilandeh Y., M. Omid, and A. Keyhani, (2007). Simulation program for predicting tractor field performance. World applied sciences journal, 2(5): 552-558.
Aboud, M. M. (1981). Tractors and its power units. Basra University Press, Coll. of Agric., Univ. of Baghdad, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. pp. 574.
Al-Banna, A.R. (1990). Tillage equipments. Dar al-Kotob for printing and publ., Univ. of Mosul. (In Arabic) ministry of higher education and scientific research. pp. 440.
Al-Hashimy, L. A. Z. (2015). Performance of some special tillage equipments under plowing and harrowing system'S. The Iraqi J. of Agric. Sci. 46(1): 36-45.
Al-Hashimy, L. A. Z. (2003). Study of some technical, economical and soil physical properties under different plowing systems. M.Sc. Thesis, Dept. of Agric. Mechani. Coll. of Agric., Univ. of Baghdad. pp. 122.
Al-Hashimy, L. A. Z. (2012). The effect of tilt angle, tillage speed and depth on some of machinery unit technical and energy requirements parameters. The Iraqi J. of Agric. Sci. 43(2): 132-143.
Al-Janobi, A. A. and A. M. Zeineldin. (1997). Development of soil bin test facility for soil tillage tool interaction studies. Coll. of Agric., Univ. of King Saad, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Agric., Res. Cen. 72: 4-10.
Al-Rawy, K. M. and A. M. Khalaf Allah. (1980). Design and analysis of agricultural experiments. The directorate of national library for printing, Publ., Univ. of Mosul, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. pp. 341.
Bahnas O. T., H. A. El-Gendy, M.A. El-Attar. (2004). Effect of some strip-till Methods on Maize Grain Yield. Misr.J. Ag.Eng.,conference :141-156.
Bowers W., B.A. Jones, and E.F. Olver. (1973). Engineering applications in agriculture (4th ed). Published by STIPES Publishing co., 10-12 chester St., Champaingn, lllinois 61820:239-243.
Embaby, A.T.(1985).A comparison of the different mechanization systems for cereal crop production.M.Sc.Thesis,faculty of Agric .Cairo Univ .
Jasim A.A and H.A. Jebur. (2015). Impact of primary tillage system on fuel consumption, management and total tractor costs. The Iraqi J. of Agric. Sci. 46(1): 31-35.
Jebur H.A, M.M. Mostafa, E.A. El-Sahhar, M.A. El-Attar and M.A. Elnono. (2013). Performance evaluation of farm tractor using variable weights on rear wheels during ploughing and sowing operations. Misr.J. Ag.Eng 30(3):645-660.
Kepner R.A., R.Bainer and E.L. Barger (1982)."Principles of farm machinery".3th edi.AVI Publishing Company, INC. Westport, Connecticut. USA.
Khader K.A.A., (2008). Effect of Some Primary Tillage Implement on Soil Pulverization and Specific Energy, Misr.J. Agric.Eng., 25(3): 731-745.
Kitano, M., J. YamaKawa, J. K. watanbe and M. Immurra. (1999). Aspatial motion analysis of tracked vehicle on dry sand's. Proceeding of 13th International Conference of the ISIUS. Munich, Germany. 2: 267-774.
Michael,J.A., J.K.F.J.Borrelli. (1985). Energy requirement of two tillage system for irrigated sugerbeets dry beans and corn ,trans of ASAE,28(6):1731- 1735.
Mostafa M.M.; M.A. El-Nono; M.A. El-Attar and R.A. El-Sayed, (2000). Performance characteristic parameters of a combined active and passive tillage machine. 8th conf. agric. Dev. Res., fac. Agric., ain shams univ., cairo, November 20-22, 2000, annals agric. Sci., sp. Issue l, 121-144.
Nielsen V., and C.G. Sorensen. (1993). Technical farm management a program for calculation of work requirement, work capacity, work budget, work profile (In danish with English summary). Danish Institute of Agriculture Engineering: Report 53:124.
Sharma D. N., and S.Mukesh. (2010). "Design of agricultural tractor" (principles and problems). Published by Shri Sunil Kumar Jain for Jain Brothers (New Delhi) 16/873, East Park Road, New Delhi – 110 005. First Edition, P.No: 199 – 213.
Srivastava, A.K., C.E. Goering, and R.P. Rohrbach. (1993). Engineering principles of agricultural machines. ASAE textbook N6 published by ASAE: 10-23.
www.Ehow.com/list 7224796-Irrigation digging equipment field Irrigation. Html. (2015).
Zoz F.M, (1974). Optimum Width and Speed for Least Cost Tillage. Trans. of the ASAE, 17(5):845-850. | ||||
|
Statistics Article View: 152 PDF Download: 167 |
||||
